public-owl-comments@w3.org from February 2009 by date

Friday, 27 February 2009

• Re: [LC Response] To Taylor Cowan Taylor Cowan

Thursday, 26 February 2009

• Re: [LC Response] to UvA (Re: new treatment of anonymous individual really necessary?) Ivan Herman

Wednesday, 25 February 2009

• Re: [LC Response] To Taylor Cowan Frank van Harmelen
• Re: [LC Response] To Frank van Harmelen Re: Request for explicit URI's for language profiles Frank van Harmelen
• Re: [LC Response] To Frank van Harmelen Re: OWL2 Feedback from Lilly Frank van Harmelen
• Re: [LC Response] to UvA (Re: new treatment of anonymous individual really necessary?) Frank van Harmelen
• [LC Response] To Taylor Cowan Ivan Herman
• [LC Response] to UvA (Re: new treatment of anonymous individual really necessary?) Ivan Herman
• [LC response] To Jim Hendler Bijan Parsia

Tuesday, 24 February 2009

• Re: [LC response] To Timothy Redmond Timothy Redmond
• [LC response] To Timothy Redmond Bijan Parsia
• Re: [LC Response] To Susie Stephens Re: OWL2 Feedback from Lilly Susie M Stephens
• Please define import closure of an ontology *document* Jonathan Rees
• Re: [LC response] To Martin Duerst (was Re: Martin Duerst: Re: please review "text/owl-functional" and "application/owl+xml") Martin Duerst

Friday, 20 February 2009

• [LC Response] To Ralf Moeller Re: OWL2 Michael Schneider

Thursday, 19 February 2009

• Re: [LC Response] To Jonathan Rees Re: Problems with sameness and namedness of individuals Jonathan Rees
• Re: [LC Response] To Jonathan Rees Re: octets vs. characters Jonathan Rees
• Re: [LC response] To Jim Hendler (was Re: Fwd: Question re: HasKey entailments) Bijan Parsia
• Re: [LC response] To Jim Hendler (was Re: Fwd: Question re: HasKey entailments) Jim Hendler
• [LC Response] To Frank van Harmelen Re: OWL2 Feedback from Lilly Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [LC response] To Jim Hendler (was Re: Fwd: Question re: HasKey entailments) Bijan Parsia
• [LC Response] To Susie Stephens Re: OWL2 Feedback from Lilly Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• [LC Response] To Jonathan Rees Re: Problems with sameness and namedness of individuals Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• [LC Response] To Frank van Harmelen Re: Request for explicit URI's for language profiles Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• [LC Response] To Jonathan Rees Re: octets vs. characters Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [LC response] To Jim Hendler (was Re: Fwd: Question re: HasKey entailments) Jim Hendler
• Re: [LC response] To Jim Hendler (was Re: Fwd: Question re: HasKey entailments) Bijan Parsia
• [LC Response] to Jan Wielemaker, Re: Triples and OWL2 Ivan Herman
• Re: [LC response] To Jim Hendler (was Re: Fwd: Question re: HasKey entailments) Jim Hendler

Wednesday, 18 February 2009

• [LC response] To Martin Duerst (was Re: Martin Duerst: Re: please review "text/owl-functional" and "application/owl+xml") Bijan Parsia
• [LC response] To Jim Hendler (was Re: Fwd: Question re: HasKey entailments) Bijan Parsia
• Re: new treatment of anonymous individual really necessary? Frank van Harmelen

Thursday, 12 February 2009

• Confusion about the status of the XML Serialisation syntax Jacco van Ossenbruggen

Wednesday, 11 February 2009

• LC comments SWD Working Group Guus Schreiber

Tuesday, 10 February 2009

• Fwd: soutien OWL2 Christine Golbreich

Monday, 9 February 2009

• Re: Fwd: OWL2 Jonas von Malottki
• Fwd: Support for OWL2 Ian Horrocks

Friday, 6 February 2009

• minor error in conformance doc Jeremy Carroll

Thursday, 5 February 2009

• OWL 2 RL semantics? Jos de Bruijn

Wednesday, 4 February 2009

• [LC Response] To Mike Smith - Re: Comment on RDF Mapping: variables in sequence pattern Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Tuesday, 3 February 2009

• Request for strongly typed functional style syntax Matthew Horridge

Monday, 2 February 2009

• Re: OWL Too? Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
• OWL2 and RDF Taylor Cowan

Sunday, 1 February 2009

• Re: OWL 2 roadmap Jonathan Rees
• octets vs. characters Jonathan Rees
• The two imports closure definitions disagree Jonathan Rees

Last message date: Friday, 27 February 2009 17:40:11 UTC