W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-comments@w3.org > February 2009

Re: [LC Response] To Taylor Cowan

From: Frank van Harmelen <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:59:47 +0100
Message-ID: <49A5DB73.6000006@cs.vu.nl>
To: public-owl-comments@w3.org
> The confusion may come from two facts:
>     1. the OWL/XML syntax, which was published as a note[2] for OWL 1, 
> is now on Recommendation track (although this does not change its role 
> in terms of exchange syntax)

Will the WG consider giving the OWL2/XML syntax the same treatment, namely 
publish it as a note, instead of having it on recommendation track? That 
would in one sweep take care of all the confusion this issue has caused, 
not only to Taylor, but to a number of other respondents as well.


Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl		http://www.cs.vu.nl/~frankh
Working on the Large Knowledge Collider	http://www.LarKC.eu
Received on Thursday, 26 February 2009 00:00:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:40:20 UTC