- From: Frank van Harmelen <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:59:47 +0100
- To: public-owl-comments@w3.org
> The confusion may come from two facts: > > 1. the OWL/XML syntax, which was published as a note[2] for OWL 1, > is now on Recommendation track (although this does not change its role > in terms of exchange syntax) Will the WG consider giving the OWL2/XML syntax the same treatment, namely publish it as a note, instead of having it on recommendation track? That would in one sweep take care of all the confusion this issue has caused, not only to Taylor, but to a number of other respondents as well. Frank. ---- -- Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl http://www.cs.vu.nl/~frankh Working on the Large Knowledge Collider http://www.LarKC.eu
Received on Thursday, 26 February 2009 00:00:26 UTC