- From: Timothy Redmond <tredmond@stanford.edu>
- Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:10:52 -0800
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-owl-comments@w3.org
Sorry Bijan - I should have replied earlier. I am quite satisfied with the response of the working group. I wanted to thank you for your kind patience in the exchange. I found it very interesting and educational. And to thank the whole working group for an amazing effort. Cheers, -Timothy On Feb 24, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Bijan Parsia wrote: > Dear Timothy, > > Thank you for your comment > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Jan/0008.html > > > on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts. > > Following our discussion, esp. considering your email: > <http://www.w3.org/mid/A84C23FA-2D01-416F-B198-CC6A9E5C2D06@stanford.edu > > > and > <http://www.w3.org/mid/1234985444.5580.78.camel@smi-tredmond-li.stanford.edu > > > the working group has decided to make no changes to our > specification. We agree that XML Catalogs needs advocacy in order > for it to become ubiquitous, but that is outside the scope of the > working group. > > Please acknowledge receipt of this email to <mailto:public-owl-comments@w3.org > > (replying to this email should suffice). In your acknowledgment > please let us know whether or not you are satisfied with the working > group's response to your comment. > > Regards, > Bijan Parsia > on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group
Received on Tuesday, 24 February 2009 22:11:31 UTC