- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:48:45 +0000
- To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.rpi.edu>
- Cc: public-owl-comments@w3.org
Dear Jim,
Thank you for your comment
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/
2009Jan/0004.html>
on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.
In subsequent discussion, our understanding is that you have agreed
that the way keys interact with classes (i.e., the class is
additional check, not something to be inferred) has merit but that
the documentation should more clearly indicate that merit. See your
message:
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Dec/
0055.html>
To this end, we have followed your suggestion and added a couple of
sentences to the first paragraph of
<http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Syntax#Keys>
which we hope makes things clear.
This response supercedes any prior response.
Please acknowledge receipt of this email to <mailto:public-owl-
comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should suffice). In your
acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you are satisfied
with the working group's response to your comment.
Regards,
Bijan Parsia
on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group
Received on Wednesday, 25 February 2009 08:45:12 UTC