public-owl-comments@w3.org from February 2009 by author

Bijan Parsia

• [LC response] To Jim Hendler (Wednesday, 25 February)
• [LC response] To Timothy Redmond (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Re: [LC response] To Jim Hendler (was Re: Fwd: Question re: HasKey entailments) (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: [LC response] To Jim Hendler (was Re: Fwd: Question re: HasKey entailments) (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: [LC response] To Jim Hendler (was Re: Fwd: Question re: HasKey entailments) (Thursday, 19 February)
• [LC response] To Martin Duerst (was Re: Martin Duerst: Re: please review "text/owl-functional" and "application/owl+xml") (Wednesday, 18 February)
• [LC response] To Jim Hendler (was Re: Fwd: Question re: HasKey entailments) (Wednesday, 18 February)

Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)

• Re: OWL Too? (Monday, 2 February)

Christine Golbreich

• Fwd: soutien OWL2 (Tuesday, 10 February)

Frank van Harmelen

• Re: [LC Response] To Taylor Cowan (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: [LC Response] To Frank van Harmelen Re: Request for explicit URI's for language profiles (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: [LC Response] To Frank van Harmelen Re: OWL2 Feedback from Lilly (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: [LC Response] to UvA (Re: new treatment of anonymous individual really necessary?) (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: new treatment of anonymous individual really necessary? (Wednesday, 18 February)

Guus Schreiber

• LC comments SWD Working Group (Wednesday, 11 February)

Ian Horrocks

• Fwd: Support for OWL2 (Monday, 9 February)

Ivan Herman

• Re: [LC Response] to UvA (Re: new treatment of anonymous individual really necessary?) (Thursday, 26 February)
• [LC Response] To Taylor Cowan (Wednesday, 25 February)
• [LC Response] to UvA (Re: new treatment of anonymous individual really necessary?) (Wednesday, 25 February)
• [LC Response] to Jan Wielemaker, Re: Triples and OWL2 (Thursday, 19 February)

Jacco van Ossenbruggen

• Confusion about the status of the XML Serialisation syntax (Thursday, 12 February)

Jeremy Carroll

• minor error in conformance doc (Friday, 6 February)

Jim Hendler

• Re: [LC response] To Jim Hendler (was Re: Fwd: Question re: HasKey entailments) (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: [LC response] To Jim Hendler (was Re: Fwd: Question re: HasKey entailments) (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: [LC response] To Jim Hendler (was Re: Fwd: Question re: HasKey entailments) (Thursday, 19 February)

Jonas von Malottki

• Re: Fwd: OWL2 (Monday, 9 February)

Jonathan Rees

• Please define import closure of an ontology *document* (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Re: [LC Response] To Jonathan Rees Re: Problems with sameness and namedness of individuals (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: [LC Response] To Jonathan Rees Re: octets vs. characters (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: OWL 2 roadmap (Sunday, 1 February)
• octets vs. characters (Sunday, 1 February)
• The two imports closure definitions disagree (Sunday, 1 February)

Jos de Bruijn

• OWL 2 RL semantics? (Thursday, 5 February)

Martin Duerst

• Re: [LC response] To Martin Duerst (was Re: Martin Duerst: Re: please review "text/owl-functional" and "application/owl+xml") (Tuesday, 24 February)

Matthew Horridge

• Request for strongly typed functional style syntax (Tuesday, 3 February)

Michael Schneider

• [LC Response] To Ralf Moeller Re: OWL2 (Friday, 20 February)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• [LC Response] To Frank van Harmelen Re: OWL2 Feedback from Lilly (Thursday, 19 February)
• [LC Response] To Susie Stephens Re: OWL2 Feedback from Lilly (Thursday, 19 February)
• [LC Response] To Jonathan Rees Re: Problems with sameness and namedness of individuals (Thursday, 19 February)
• [LC Response] To Frank van Harmelen Re: Request for explicit URI's for language profiles (Thursday, 19 February)
• [LC Response] To Jonathan Rees Re: octets vs. characters (Thursday, 19 February)
• [LC Response] To Mike Smith - Re: Comment on RDF Mapping: variables in sequence pattern (Wednesday, 4 February)

Susie M Stephens

• Re: [LC Response] To Susie Stephens Re: OWL2 Feedback from Lilly (Tuesday, 24 February)

Taylor Cowan

• Re: [LC Response] To Taylor Cowan (Friday, 27 February)
• OWL2 and RDF (Monday, 2 February)

Timothy Redmond

• Re: [LC response] To Timothy Redmond (Tuesday, 24 February)

Last message date: Friday, 27 February 2009 17:40:11 UTC