- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:49:19 +0900
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-owl-comments@w3.org
Hello Bijan, Many thanks for your mail. Except for putting proposed spec text on a Wiki page (which might make it a moving target), I'm fully satisfied with your resolution. I hope that RDF also will go the same direction in due time. Regards, Martin. At 00:50 09/02/19, Bijan Parsia wrote: >Dear Martin, > >Thank you for your comment > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/ 2009Jan/0003.html> >on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts. > >The hardcoded references to Unicode 3.0 were inherited from RDF and >RDF/XML. Upon investigation, the WG decided that we did not need to >and should not add more "point of update" for Unicode (or XML) >references in spite of our dependancy on RDF and RDF/XML. >Accordingly, we have shifted to a generic reference, as described in: > > <http://www.w3.org/TR/charmod/#sec-RefUnicode> > >The reference text is available at: > > <http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/References/unicode> > >and we welcome any other suggestions you might have. (Changes to this >template will propagate throughout our documents.) > >We have added text to our conformance document describing the >situtation. We also filed a bug report against the RDF specs: > > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/ 2009JanMar/0001.html> > >Please acknowledge receipt of this email to <mailto:public-owl- comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should suffice). In your >acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you are satisfied >with the working group's response to your comment. > >Regards, >Bijan Parsia >on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp
Received on Tuesday, 24 February 2009 05:25:57 UTC