- From: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 21:55:23 -0800
- To: <public-owl-comments@w3.org>
Sorry this is a late comment. Well two comments really, one a minor error, the other a worry. Both concern: http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-owl2-test-20081202/#Syntactic_Conformance section 2.1.1. - iff The iff in the penultimate sentence (in the example box) contradicts the first two sentences of the section. [[ An XML document is an OWL 2 DL ontology document *iff* it validates ... ]] -- - is In the first few sentences the use of the word "is" is a little confusing. It seems that the defined terms are intended to have partial definitions, not complete definitions. While I have some anxiety about this opening the door to private convention and interoperability failure, I think I will not press that point. It may be worth having an introductory sentence [[ In light of this, the terms "OWL 2 * ontology document" are only defined partially. ]] A sentence or two of caution about too many other formats would perhaps be in order. Jeremy
Received on Friday, 6 February 2009 05:56:05 UTC