public-linked-json@w3.org from March 2014 by thread

UniProt RDF as JSON-LD please test and give feedback, Jerven Bolleman (Wednesday, 19 March)

• RE: UniProt RDF as JSON-LD please test and give feedback, Markus Lanthaler (Wednesday, 19 March)
  • Re: UniProt RDF as JSON-LD please test and give feedback, Jerven Tjalling Bolleman (Thursday, 20 March)
    • Re: UniProt RDF as JSON-LD please test and give feedback, Jerven Tjalling Bolleman (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: UniProt RDF as JSON-LD please test and give feedback, Kingsley Idehen (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: UniProt RDF as JSON-LD please test and give feedback, Nicholas Bollweg (Wednesday, 19 March)

Compact terms with expanded values Fabian Steeg (Monday, 17 March)

• RE: Compact terms with expanded values Markus Lanthaler (Wednesday, 19 March)

My current work Jean-Claude Moissinac (Thursday, 13 March)

• Re: My current work Joakim Soderberg (Tuesday, 18 March)
  • Jena with JSON-LD (was: My current work) Andy Seaborne (Tuesday, 18 March)

Specifying different vocabularies for @type and property names Laurence Rowe (Wednesday, 12 March)

• RE: Specifying different vocabularies for @type and property names Markus Lanthaler (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Re: Specifying different vocabularies for @type and property names Laurence Rowe (Wednesday, 12 March)
  • RE: Specifying different vocabularies for @type and property names Markus Lanthaler (Wednesday, 12 March)

Ignore JSON nesting Bert Spaan (Tuesday, 11 March)

Ignore JSON nesting Bert Spaan (Tuesday, 11 March)

• Re: Ignore JSON nesting Gregg Kellogg (Tuesday, 11 March)
  • Re: Ignore JSON nesting Bert Spaan (Thursday, 13 March)
    • Re: Ignore JSON nesting Gregg Kellogg (Thursday, 13 March)
      • RE: Ignore JSON nesting Markus Lanthaler (Thursday, 13 March)
        • RE: Ignore JSON nesting Bert Spaan (Thursday, 13 March)
          • RE: Ignore JSON nesting Markus Lanthaler (Thursday, 13 March)
            • RE: Ignore JSON nesting Bert Spaan (Friday, 14 March)
  • Re: Ignore JSON nesting Sebastian Heath (Thursday, 13 March)

Random JSON-LD requests for the future: @job & slash-rooted paths David Janes (Saturday, 8 March)

• RE: Random JSON-LD requests for the future: @job & slash-rooted paths Markus Lanthaler (Monday, 10 March)
  • Re: Random JSON-LD requests for the future: @job & slash-rooted paths Sandro Hawke (Monday, 10 March)
    • RE: Random JSON-LD requests for the future: @job & slash-rooted paths Markus Lanthaler (Monday, 10 March)
      • Re: Random JSON-LD requests for the future: @job & slash-rooted paths Sandro Hawke (Monday, 10 March)
        • RE: Random JSON-LD requests for the future: @job & slash-rooted paths Markus Lanthaler (Monday, 10 March)

compaction Jean-Claude Moissinac (Saturday, 8 March)

• RE: compaction Markus Lanthaler (Saturday, 8 March)
• Re: compaction Jean-Claude Moissinac (Tuesday, 18 March)

In the spec, swap RFC4627 for RFC7159 Thomas Steiner (Thursday, 6 March)

• Re: In the spec, swap RFC4627 for RFC7159 Sandro Hawke (Thursday, 6 March)
  • Re: In the spec, swap RFC4627 for RFC7159 Ivan Herman (Thursday, 6 March)
• RE: In the spec, swap RFC4627 for RFC7159 Markus Lanthaler (Thursday, 6 March)
• Re: In the spec, swap RFC4627 for RFC7159 Thomas Steiner (Thursday, 6 March)
  • RE: In the spec, swap RFC4627 for RFC7159 Markus Lanthaler (Thursday, 6 March)
• Re: In the spec, swap RFC4627 for RFC7159 David I. Lehn (Thursday, 6 March)
  • RE: In the spec, swap RFC4627 for RFC7159 Markus Lanthaler (Saturday, 8 March)

Last message date: Thursday, 20 March 2014 14:21:16 UTC