- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 17:04:56 +0100
- To: "'Gregg Kellogg'" <gregg@greggkellogg.net>, "'Bert Spaan'" <bert@waag.org>
- Cc: <public-linked-json@w3.org>
On Thursday, March 13, 2014 5:01 PM, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
> On Mar 13, 2014, at 6:51 AM, Bert Spaan wrote:
> > I've found a solution for my problem, by using an extra
> > predicate ('geojsonProperties', which can be ignored), and
> > using the same @id twice. What do you think?
>
> Sure, that should do it, you end up with an extra triple is all.
... which would be eliminated by the API by default if you would map it to a
blank node.
--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler
Received on Thursday, 13 March 2014 16:05:31 UTC