- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:58:42 +0100
- To: "'Linked JSON'" <public-linked-json@w3.org>
On Saturday, March 08, 2014 8:13 PM, David Janes wrote: > I've been using JSON-LD for awhile and there's two things I'd Cool. Do you have some pointers or could you share how you used JSON-LD? > like to suggest two ideas for future releases > > (1) "@job" (like a BLOB in a DB) > > It would be nice if I could mark part of the JSON-LD as having > "no semantic meaning / interpretation" and that it would be passed > various functions (compaction, etc) without being touched. > > The lack of this has made me do some ugly / questionable things... We are aware of that shortcoming and have been discussing it several times but decided to leave it out of JSON-LD 1.0 due to its algorithmic complexity. I've created ISSUE-333 to keep track of this: https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/333 > (2) "/" routed IRIs > > Instead of returning various @base relative IRIs as "../../../x/y/z", > it would be nice if there was an option for just getting "/x/y/z". Can't you achieve that by simply setting the base to the domain instead of some directory? So, http://example.com/ instead of http://example.com/a/directory/ -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Monday, 10 March 2014 13:59:15 UTC