- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:00:31 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10524 Summary: Please clarify procedure and recourse for non-working group members when they are unsatisfied with a bug resolution Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: All URL: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-polic y.html OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: working group Decision Policy AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org ReportedBy: laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mjs@apple.com, Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com, rubys@intertwingly.net, mike@w3.org The boiler plate editor's bug resolution response states: "If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue." So a non-working group member can ask that their bug be escalated. However, if a working group member does not write a change proposal and champion said issue, the issue is closed. Is filing a formal objection their only option if that happens? Please explain in the decision policy the: * Procedure non-working group members should follow where it differs from WG members. * Recourse/options non-working group members have if they are 1.) unsatisfied with a bug resolution, 2.) they don't want to join the working group, and 3.) no working group member volunteers to write a change proposal on their behalf. Thanks. References: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-comments/2010Aug/0032.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-comments/2010Aug/0034.html -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 1 September 2010 14:00:36 UTC