W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > September 2010

[Bug 10524] Please clarify procedure and recourse for non-working group members when they are unsatisfied with a bug resolution

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 18:48:45 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1OvE57-0000ao-V4@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10524





--- Comment #16 from Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>  2010-09-13 18:48:45 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> > > * Are non-members allowed to write change proposals? 
> > 
> > The simple answer is yes, but this is not a simple question.  There will be
> > conditions that will be placed over and above the conditions placed on members.
> >  What those conditions will be will depend on the reason why the person is
> > unwilling to become a member in the first place.
> 
> There's nothing in the Decision Process that demands a person must explain why
> they don't want to become a member. (Or is there, and I missed it?)
> 
> There's also nothing in any of the documentation linked in this thread that
> mentions "extra conditions". What might these be?

As previously stated, and just as an example: if the reason why a person is not
a member is that they are unwilling or unable to follow the decision
guidelines, then that person is entirely unwelcome here.  Period.

A different reason could conceivably get a different set of conditions, again,
all depending on the reason.

If no reason is given, then there is no guarantee that change proposals will be
accepted.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 13 September 2010 18:48:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:24 UTC