- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 19:21:32 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10524 --- Comment #1 from Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> 2010-09-01 19:21:31 --- (In reply to comment #0) > > So a non-working group member can ask that their bug be escalated. However, if > a working group member does not write a change proposal and champion said > issue, the issue is closed. There is a saying in the legal profession that hard cases make for bad laws. I think this is one of the cases. I believe that the scenario that is being described here is that somebody outside of the working group reports a bug, and (a) nobody within the working group takes enough interest in the bug to propose a resolution in the form of a change proposal, (b) the original person who reported the bug is willing to write a change proposal, (c) said individual is not willing to agree to the W3C Patent Policy or otherwise is not willing to follow the process that has been put into place ensuring that the W3C has sufficient rights to incorporate said proposal, and (d) said individual is willing to accept the decision of the very same group on the disposition of the proposal. Yes, in such a case the outcome would be that the only outcome of raising the issue would be to confirm that nobody in the working group has an active interest in addressing the problem reported, but even then, the issue would be closed without prejudice. Relaxing any of (a), (b), (c), or (d) results in a different outcome. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 1 September 2010 19:21:33 UTC