W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > September 2010

[Bug 10524] Please clarify procedure and recourse for non-working group members when they are unsatisfied with a bug resolution

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:48:59 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1OvD9H-0006RL-U2@jessica.w3.org>

--- Comment #10 from Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>  2010-09-13 17:48:59 ---
(In reply to comment #9)

> First, the rules have not changed, they simply have been published[3].
> Second, nobody has been singled out.  In my 1.75 years as co-chair, I can
> attest to the fact that there are plenty of people who have been counseled on
> their participation.  And, no, I have no intention of "outing" them.
> And, finally, yes -- they are barriers to participation.  People who
> consistently can not follow these simple rules are not welcome to participate
> in this effort.  Period. 
> - Sam Ruby


Does the Decision Process not say non-members can file a change proposal?

Is there a rule, in the HTML WG or the W3C that states a person can only join
in a probationary state?

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 13 September 2010 17:49:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:24 UTC