W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > September 2010

[Bug 10524] Please clarify procedure and recourse for non-working group members when they are unsatisfied with a bug resolution

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 19:38:55 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1OvErf-0002dz-9e@jessica.w3.org>

--- Comment #22 from Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>  2010-09-13 19:38:54 ---
(In reply to comment #19)

Hi Shelley,

> I don't believe we need to specify extenuating circumstances. 
> The HTML WG chairs should consider that people wanting to do the extra work
> required for change proposals are doing so out of interest and wanting to
> contribute. 

That would be a good perspective.

> Instead, this implies that anyone who wants to contribute a change proposal,
> but doesn't want to join the HTML WG, is to be treated with suspicion--having
> to produce motive, which will then undergo scrutiny for possible nefarious
> purpose.
> Is this really what the HTML WG wants to imply?

I don't think so. 

Do you have better suggested text for the policy to fix this bug?


Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 13 September 2010 19:38:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:24 UTC