public-device-apis@w3.org from October 2015 by date

Friday, 30 October 2015

• Re: [sensors] Possibility to use "Readable Stream" as defined by the Streams API Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Current draft links to tobie's github Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Closed: [sensors] Current draft links to tobie's github Tobie Langel via GitHub

Thursday, 29 October 2015

• Re: [sensors] Current draft links to tobie's github Tobie Langel via GitHub

Wednesday, 28 October 2015

• [sensors] Possibility to use "Readable Stream" as defined by the Streams API Claes Nilsson via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Current draft links to tobie's github Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub
• [sensors] Addressing finger printing concerns for sensor APIs Dave Raggett via GitHub
• [sensors] Sensors for continuously changing real valued properties Dave Raggett via GitHub
• [sensors] Current draft links to tobie's github Jeffrey Yasskin via GitHub

Tuesday, 27 October 2015

• [sensors] Spec should allow user agents to reduce or disable polling for power saving purposes Mark Foltz via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Provide a way of tying sensor requests to animation frames Mark Foltz via GitHub

Monday, 26 October 2015

• Re: Reviewing the Charter Mats Wichmann
• Re: Reviewing the Charter timeless

Tuesday, 20 October 2015

• Re: Introduction of WebI2C and WebGPIO Futomi Hatano
• Re: Introduction of WebI2C and WebGPIO Dave Raggett
• Re: Introduction of WebI2C and WebGPIO Futomi Hatano

Monday, 19 October 2015

• Re: Summary of rationale for discontinuing the Web Intents work Mats Wichmann
• Re: Summary of rationale for discontinuing the Web Intents work Arthur Barstow
• Summary of rationale for discontinuing the Web Intents work Frederick Hirsch
• Re: Call for Consensus (CfC) to close the Web Intents Task Force - Deadline October 29, 2015 Nick Doty
• Re: Introduction of WebI2C and WebGPIO 전종홍
• Re: Introduction of WebI2C and WebGPIO Drasko DRASKOVIC
• Re: Introduction of WebI2C and WebGPIO Futomi Hatano
• Re: Introduction of WebI2C and WebGPIO Michael Koster
• Re: Introduction of WebI2C and WebGPIO Futomi Hatano
• Re: Introduction of WebI2C and WebGPIO Dave Raggett
• Re: Introduction of WebI2C and WebGPIO 전종홍

Friday, 16 October 2015

• Closed: [sensors] Add a threshold option Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Add a threshold option Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Closed: [sensors] Add a timeout property? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Relation to REST APIs and W3C Web of Things activities Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Closed: [sensors] Relation to REST APIs and W3C Web of Things activities Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Closed: [sensors] Ability to lookup a cached SensorReading without polling the sensor Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Ability to lookup a cached SensorReading without polling the sensor Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Closed: [sensors] Should sensor EventTarget be immediately available or should they be accessed through a promise? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should sensor EventTarget be immediately available or should they be accessed through a promise? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Closed: [sensors] What precisely, do we mean by "generic"? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Closed: [sensors] When there are multiple sensors of a given type, how do we identify which one to instantiate? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] When there are multiple sensors of a given type, how do we identify which one to instantiate? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Relation to REST APIs and W3C Web of Things activities Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Does `SensorObserver` need a stop() method? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Closed: [sensors] Does `SensorObserver` need a stop() method? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Is a Promise-returning, "oneshot" method useful? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Closed: [sensors] Is a Promise-returning, "oneshot" method useful? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Closed: [sensors] Address questions around exposing high-level, low-level, and uncalibrated sensors Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Address questions around exposing high-level, low-level, and uncalibrated sensors Tobie Langel via GitHub

Thursday, 15 October 2015

• Re: Call for Consensus (CfC) to close the Web Intents Task Force - Deadline October 29, 2015 Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: Call for Consensus (CfC) to close the Web Intents Task Force - Deadline October 29, 2015 Mats Wichmann
• Call for Consensus (CfC) to close the Web Intents Task Force - Deadline October 29, 2015 Frederick Hirsch
• Call for Consensus (CfC) to Approve revised DAP Charter and group name change - deadline 29 October 2015 Frederick Hirsch
• Draft minutes teleconference 15 October 2015 Frederick Hirsch
• DAP-ACTION-740: Send cfc to close web intents tf Device APIs Working Group Issue Tracker
• DAP-ACTION-739: Send cfc for 2 week approval of progressing with charter and name change Device APIs Working Group Issue Tracker
• FPWD of Generic Sensor API available Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Call for Exclusions: Generic Sensor API Xueyuan Jia
• Re: Introduction of WebI2C and WebGPIO Satoru Takagi
• Re: Introduction of WebI2C and WebGPIO Satoru Takagi
• Re: Introduction of WebI2C and WebGPIO Futomi Hatano
• Re: Introduction of WebI2C and WebGPIO Michael Koster

Wednesday, 14 October 2015

• Re: Introduction of WebI2C and WebGPIO Drasko DRASKOVIC
• Re: Introduction of WebI2C and WebGPIO Dave Raggett
• Re: Introduction of WebI2C and WebGPIO Drasko DRASKOVIC
• Re: Introduction of WebI2C and WebGPIO Rick Waldron
• Re: Introduction of WebI2C and WebGPIO Dave Raggett
• [admin] Agenda - DAP Distributed Meeting 15 October 2015 Frederick Hirsch
• Finalizing DAP new charter Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• [media capture] Results of Vote on Media Capture and Streams Constraints Registry Frederick Hirsch
• Re: Introduction of WebI2C and WebGPIO Drasko DRASKOVIC
• Re: Introduction of WebI2C and WebGPIO Satoru Takagi
• Re: Introduction of WebI2C and WebGPIO Drasko DRASKOVIC
• Re: Introduction of WebI2C and WebGPIO Futomi Hatano
• Re: Introduction of WebI2C and WebGPIO Drasko DRASKOVIC
• Introduction of WebI2C and WebGPIO Satoru Takagi

Monday, 12 October 2015

• Generic Sensor API Status update Frederick Hirsch

Sunday, 11 October 2015

• Call for Consensus to publish FPWD of Generic Sensor API completed successfully Frederick Hirsch

Saturday, 10 October 2015

• CfC Generic Sensor API shortname - deadline Tue 13 October Frederick Hirsch

Wednesday, 7 October 2015

• Re: CfC: Call for Consensus to publish FPWD of Generic Sensor API, deadline Friday 9 October Kostiainen, Anssi

Tuesday, 6 October 2015

• Re: CfC: Call for Consensus to publish FPWD of Generic Sensor API, deadline Friday 9 October Rick Waldron
• [media capture] VOTE - Media Capture and Streams Constraints Registry; deadline 13 October 2015 Frederick Hirsch
• CfC: Call for Consensus to publish FPWD of Generic Sensor API, deadline Friday 9 October Frederick Hirsch
• Joint meeting: Geolocation and Automotive Working Groups, TPAC 2015, October 27, 2015 Mandyam, Giridhar
• Closed: [sensors] Handle sensors with multiple values Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Closed: [sensors] Agree on coarseness of frequency option Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Closed: [sensors] Should sensors require a privileged context? Tobie Langel via GitHub

Saturday, 3 October 2015

• Closed: [sensors] Have a good feature detection story Tobie Langel via GitHub

Thursday, 1 October 2015

• Input to generic sensor API - current outstanding issues with respect to Geolocation and DeviceOrientation Mandyam, Giridhar
• TPAC ad hoc DAP Generic Sensor API meetings Frederick Hirsch
• Draft minutes 2015-10-01 Frederick Hirsch

Last message date: Friday, 30 October 2015 07:19:53 UTC