public-device-apis-log@w3.org from November 2016 by date

Tuesday, 29 November 2016

• [wake-lock] Plans for v2 Andrey Logvinov via GitHub

Wednesday, 23 November 2016

• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Tobie Langel via GitHub

Tuesday, 22 November 2016

• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? raymeskhoury via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Owen Campbell-Moore via GitHub

Friday, 18 November 2016

• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Tobie Langel via GitHub

Thursday, 17 November 2016

• Re: [wake-lock] "System" wake lock use cases André Cipriani Bandarra via GitHub

Wednesday, 16 November 2016

• Re: [sensors] Exposing secondary values in the SensorReading Rick Waldron via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Call onchange only when data changes Rick Waldron via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Exposing secondary values in the SensorReading Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Exposing secondary values in the SensorReading Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Exposing secondary values in the SensorReading Rick Waldron via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Relation to Feature Policy Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub

Tuesday, 15 November 2016

• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Call onchange only when data changes Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Exposing secondary values in the SensorReading Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Exposing secondary values in the SensorReading Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Exposing secondary values in the SensorReading Rick Waldron via GitHub
• Re: [magnetometer] Provide API to access uncalibrated magnetometer values Rick Waldron via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Call onchange only when data changes Rick Waldron via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [magnetometer] Provide API to access uncalibrated magnetometer values Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Exposing secondary values in the SensorReading Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub
• Re: [magnetometer] Provide API to access uncalibrated magnetometer values Rick Waldron via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Exposing secondary values in the SensorReading Rick Waldron via GitHub
• Re: [magnetometer] Provide API to access uncalibrated magnetometer values Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub
• Re: [magnetometer] Provide API to access uncalibrated magnetometer values Rick Waldron via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub
• Re: [magnetometer] Provide API to access uncalibrated magnetometer values Alexander Shalamov via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub

Monday, 14 November 2016

• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] granularity of Permission name for concrete/ fusion sensors Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] granularity of Permission name for concrete/ fusion sensors Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] granularity of Permission name for concrete/ fusion sensors Maryam Mehr via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] granularity of Permission name for concrete/ fusion sensors Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] granularity of Permission name for concrete/ fusion sensors Maryam Mehr via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Maryam Mehr via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] granularity of Permission name for concrete/ fusion sensors Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Relation to Feature Policy Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] granularity of Permission name for concrete/ fusion sensors Maryam Mehr via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Relation to Feature Policy Maryam Mehr via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Maryam Mehr via GitHub

Friday, 11 November 2016

• Re: [sensors] Call onchange only when data changes Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Call onchange only when data changes Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Call onchange only when data changes Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Call onchange only when data changes Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Call onchange only when data changes Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Call onchange only when data changes Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub
• [sensors] Call onchange only when data changes Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub

Thursday, 10 November 2016

• Re: [sensors] SensorErrorEvent IDL doesn't match Blink Philip Jägenstedt via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] SensorErrorEvent IDL doesn't match Blink Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] SensorErrorEvent IDL doesn't match Blink Philip Jägenstedt via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] SensorErrorEvent IDL doesn't match Blink Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] SensorErrorEvent IDL doesn't match Blink Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [ambient-light] Is "frequency" available in ALS? Wanming Lin via GitHub
• Closed: [ambient-light] Is "frequency" available in ALS? Wanming Lin via GitHub

Wednesday, 9 November 2016

• Re: [ambient-light] Is "frequency" available in ALS? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Reporting mode and polling frequency Tobie Langel via GitHub
• [ambient-light] Is "frequency" available in ALS? Wanming Lin via GitHub

Tuesday, 8 November 2016

• Re: [sensors] Exposing secondary values in the SensorReading Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Exposing secondary values in the SensorReading Rick Waldron via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] granularity of Permission name for concrete/ fusion sensors Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Maryam Mehr via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Malicious use of the phone's Gyroscope Maryam Mehr via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] granularity of Permission name for concrete/ fusion sensors Maryam Mehr via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] granularity of Permission name for concrete/ fusion sensors Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] granularity of Permission name for concrete/ fusion sensors Maryam Mehr via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] granularity of Permission name for concrete/ fusion sensors Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] granularity of Permission name for concrete/ fusion sensors Maryam Mehr via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Maryam Mehr via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? Maryam Mehr via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Should we request permission when sensor is not supported by the platform? maryammjd via GitHub
• Closed: [ambient-light] Should we really redefine AmbientLightSensor.reading? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [ambient-light] Should we really redefine AmbientLightSensor.reading? Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [ambient-light] Should we really redefine AmbientLightSensor.reading? Anne van Kesteren via GitHub
• Re: [ambient-light] Should we really redefine AmbientLightSensor.reading? Anne van Kesteren via GitHub
• Re: [ambient-light] Should we really redefine AmbientLightSensor.reading? Dominique Hazael-Massieux via GitHub
• Re: [ambient-light] Should we really redefine AmbientLightSensor.reading? Dominique Hazael-Massieux via GitHub
• [sensors] Exposing secondary values in the SensorReading Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [ambient-light] Should we really redefine AmbientLightSensor.reading? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [ambient-light] Should we really redefine AmbientLightSensor.reading? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [magnetometer] Provide API to access uncalibrated magnetometer values Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [ambient-light] Should we really redefine AmbientLightSensor.reading? Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [magnetometer] Provide API to access uncalibrated magnetometer values Rijubrata Bhaumik via GitHub
• [sensors] Should SensorReading be a dictionary? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• [ambient-light] Should we really redefine AmbientLightSensor.reading? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [magnetometer] Provide API to access uncalibrated magnetometer values Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [magnetometer] Provide API to access uncalibrated magnetometer values Rijubrata Bhaumik via GitHub
• Re: [magnetometer] Provide API to access uncalibrated magnetometer values Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [magnetometer] Provide API to access uncalibrated magnetometer values Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [magnetometer] Provide API to access uncalibrated magnetometer values Rijubrata Bhaumik via GitHub
• Re: [magnetometer] Provide API to access uncalibrated magnetometer values Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [magnetometer] Provide API to access uncalibrated magnetometer values Rijubrata Bhaumik via GitHub
• Re: [magnetometer] Provide API to access uncalibrated magnetometer values Rijubrata Bhaumik via GitHub

Monday, 7 November 2016

• Re: [sensors] Issues caused by visibility state restriction semantics Tobie Langel via GitHub

Friday, 4 November 2016

• Re: [magnetometer] Provide API to access uncalibrated magnetometer values Rick Waldron via GitHub
• Re: [magnetometer] Provide API to access uncalibrated magnetometer values Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub
• Re: [ambient-light] What illuminance value should be reported for stopped sensor? Rick Waldron via GitHub
• Re: [magnetometer] Provide API to access uncalibrated magnetometer values Rick Waldron via GitHub
• Re: [magnetometer] Provide API to access uncalibrated magnetometer values Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub
• Re: [magnetometer] Provide API to access uncalibrated magnetometer values Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [magnetometer] Provide API to access uncalibrated magnetometer values Rick Waldron via GitHub
• Re: [battery] Mitigating potential privacy-invasive usage Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [magnetometer] Provide API to access uncalibrated magnetometer values Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [magnetometer] Provide API to access uncalibrated magnetometer values Alexander Shalamov via GitHub
• Re: [magnetometer] Provide API to access uncalibrated magnetometer values Alexander Shalamov via GitHub
• Re: [battery] Mitigating potential privacy-invasive usage Marcos Cáceres via GitHub

Thursday, 3 November 2016

• Re: [magnetometer] Provide API to access uncalibrated magnetometer values Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [magnetometer] Provide API to access uncalibrated magnetometer values Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [magnetometer] Provide API to access uncalibrated magnetometer values Rijubrata Bhaumik via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] granularity of Permission name for concrete/ fusion sensors Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] TAG feedback on wake-lock API Andrey Logvinov via GitHub
• Re: [magnetometer] Provide API to access uncalibrated magnetometer values Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• [magnetometer] Provide API to access uncalibrated magnetometer values Alexander Shalamov via GitHub
• Re: [battery] Mitigating potential privacy-invasive usage Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [battery] Mitigating potential privacy-invasive usage Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [battery] Mitigating potential privacy-invasive usage Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [battery] Mitigating potential privacy-invasive usage Marcos Cáceres via GitHub

Wednesday, 2 November 2016

• Re: [ambient-light] What illuminance value should be reported for stopped sensor? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [ambient-light] What illuminance value should be reported for stopped sensor? Rick Waldron via GitHub
• [sensors] Issues caused by visibility state restriction semantics Rick Waldron via GitHub
• Re: [battery] Mitigating potential privacy-invasive usage Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub
• Re: [battery] Mitigating potential privacy-invasive usage Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [battery] Mitigating potential privacy-invasive usage Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub
• Re: [battery] Mitigating potential privacy-invasive usage Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Using PIA terminology Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Closed: [sensors] Using PIA terminology Tobie Langel via GitHub

Tuesday, 1 November 2016

• Re: [sensors] granularity of Permission name for concrete/ fusion sensors Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Updating privacy considerations - accounting Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Updating privacy considerations - accounting Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] granularity of Permission name for concrete/ fusion sensors Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub
• Re: [battery] Mitigating potential privacy-invasive usage Chris Peterson via GitHub
• Re: [battery] Mitigating potential privacy-invasive usage Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [battery] Mitigating potential privacy-invasive usage Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [ambient-light] What illuminance value should be reported for stopped sensor? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [ambient-light] What illuminance value should be reported for stopped sensor? Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub
• Closed: [sensors] Add prose for on{error|change} Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [ambient-light] What illuminance value should be reported for stopped sensor? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Updating privacy considerations - accounting Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [ambient-light] What illuminance value should be reported for stopped sensor? Alexander Shalamov via GitHub
• [sensors] Updating privacy considerations - accounting Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] granularity of Permission name for concrete/ fusion sensors Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Possibility of cross-domain communication using frequency in periodic reporting mode Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] granularity of Permission name for concrete/ fusion sensors Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] SensorReadings must be immutable. Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] SensorReadings must be immutable. Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub
• Re: [ambient-light] What illuminance value should be reported for stopped sensor? Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [ambient-light] What illuminance value should be reported for stopped sensor? Alexander Shalamov via GitHub

Last message date: Tuesday, 29 November 2016 16:23:11 UTC