W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis-log@w3.org > November 2016

Re: [sensors] granularity of Permission name for concrete/ fusion sensors

From: Maryam Mehr via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 15:27:13 +0000
To: public-device-apis-log@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-260365695-1479137232-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
This would work for now I assume. However while we have a long list of
 sensors at the moment, the combination of them would be even longer 
for different purposes. At the moment we have orientation, motion, and
 rotation as the two common sensor fusion examples. Later things like 
step counter, head tracker, and other use cases would emerge. Do you 
actually think it is reasonable to offer high-level permission model 
while we don't even know if different developers are using the same 
low-level sensors for a single high-level application? 

GitHub Notification of comment by maryammjd
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues/132#issuecomment-260365695 using
 your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 14 November 2016 15:27:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 4 July 2022 12:47:53 UTC