public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from June 2016 by date

Thursday, 30 June 2016

Re: shapes-ISSUE-172 (sh:nodeKind SPARQL definition): the sh:nodeKind SPARQL definition is unnecessarily complex [SHACL Spec] Karen Coyle
Re: abstract syntax for SHACL Eric Prud'hommeaux

Wednesday, 29 June 2016

Re: shapes-ISSUE-172 (sh:nodeKind SPARQL definition): the sh:nodeKind SPARQL definition is unnecessarily complex [SHACL Spec] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: shapes-ISSUE-172 (sh:nodeKind SPARQL definition): the sh:nodeKind SPARQL definition is unnecessarily complex [SHACL Spec] Karen Coyle
Re: shapes-ISSUE-172 (sh:nodeKind SPARQL definition): the sh:nodeKind SPARQL definition is unnecessarily complex [SHACL Spec] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 30 June 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
Re: shapes-ISSUE-172 (sh:nodeKind SPARQL definition): the sh:nodeKind SPARQL definition is unnecessarily complex [SHACL Spec] Arnaud Le Hors
RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 23 June 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
Re: shapes-ISSUE-172 (sh:nodeKind SPARQL definition): the sh:nodeKind SPARQL definition is unnecessarily complex [SHACL Spec] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
abstract syntax for SHACL Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: shapes-ISSUE-172 (sh:nodeKind SPARQL definition): the sh:nodeKind SPARQL definition is unnecessarily complex [SHACL Spec] Karen Coyle
shapes-ISSUE-172 (sh:nodeKind SPARQL definition): the sh:nodeKind SPARQL definition is unnecessarily complex [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
shapes-ISSUE-171 (negated sh:classIn): sh:classIn SPARQL definition incorrect [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
shapes-ISSUE-170 (exists blank nodes): SPARQL specifies a different reading for exists and blank nodes than needed for SHACL RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: invocation conflicting with sh:scope* Eric Prud'hommeaux

Saturday, 25 June 2016

Re: shapes-ACTION-38: Work on an erratum for exists Andy Seaborne
Re: shapes-ACTION-39: Email wg lists about the places where discussion on exists is happening. Andy Seaborne

Friday, 24 June 2016

Re: invocation conflicting with sh:scope* Dimitris Kontokostas

Thursday, 23 June 2016

how to fix pre-binding (via fixing EXISTS) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Example to take to W3C Peter F. Patel-Schneider
shapes-ACTION-39: Email wg lists about the places where discussion on exists is happening. RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
shapes-ACTION-38: Work on an erratum for exists RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: invocation conflicting with sh:scope* Karen Coyle
Re: shapes-ISSUE-168 (instance count): How to constrain number of instances of a class in a graph [SHACL - Core] Karen Coyle
Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 23 June 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
Re: invocation conflicting with sh:scope* Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 23 June 2016 Dimitris Kontokostas
Re: invocation conflicting with sh:scope* Holger Knublauch
Re: invocation conflicting with sh:scope* Eric Prud'hommeaux
Maybe "scope" is just not the right term Holger Knublauch

Wednesday, 22 June 2016

Re: shapes-ISSUE-168 (instance count): How to constrain number of instances of a class in a graph [SHACL - Core] Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-168 (instance count): How to constrain number of instances of a class in a graph [SHACL - Core] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: shapes-ISSUE-168 (instance count): How to constrain number of instances of a class in a graph [SHACL - Core] Holger Knublauch
Re: invocation conflicting with sh:scope* Holger Knublauch
Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 23 June 2016 Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-168 (instance count): How to constrain number of instances of a class in a graph [SHACL - Core] Arnaud Le Hors
invocation conflicting with sh:scope* Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: caution on using EXISTS and pre-binding in SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 23 June 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
Re: shapes-ISSUE-168 (instance count): How to constrain number of instances of a class in a graph [SHACL - Core] Irene Polikoff
Re: shapes-ISSUE-168 (instance count): How to constrain number of instances of a class in a graph [SHACL - Core] Karen Coyle
Re: shapes-ISSUE-168 (instance count): How to constrain number of instances of a class in a graph [SHACL - Core] Irene Polikoff
Re: shapes-ISSUE-168 (instance count): How to constrain number of instances of a class in a graph [SHACL - Core] Karen Coyle

Tuesday, 21 June 2016

Re: shapes-ISSUE-168 (instance count): How to constrain number of instances of a class in a graph [SHACL - Core] Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-168 (instance count): How to constrain number of instances of a class in a graph [SHACL - Core] Karen Coyle
agenda item for this week Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 16 June 2016 Arnaud Le Hors

Monday, 20 June 2016

Re: caution on using EXISTS and pre-binding in SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: caution on using EXISTS and pre-binding in SHACL Karen Coyle

Sunday, 19 June 2016

caution on using EXISTS and pre-binding in SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Saturday, 18 June 2016

Re: shapes-ISSUE-168 (instance count): How to constrain number of instances of a class in a graph [SHACL - Core] Karen Coyle
shapes-ISSUE-169 (sh:scopeProperty naming): Should we rename sh:scopeProperty/InverseProperty [SHACL - Core] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker

Friday, 17 June 2016

Thursday, 16 June 2016

paper on problems with substitute in SPARQL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Boierplate macro (Was: Re: ISSUE-139: single implementations of all core constraint components) Karen Coyle

Wednesday, 15 June 2016

Re: Boierplate macro (Was: Re: ISSUE-139: single implementations of all core constraint components) Holger Knublauch
Re: Boierplate macro (Was: Re: ISSUE-139: single implementations of all core constraint components) Holger Knublauch
RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 16 June 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
Re: Boierplate macro (Was: Re: ISSUE-139: single implementations of all core constraint components) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Boierplate macro (Was: Re: ISSUE-139: single implementations of all core constraint components) Karen Coyle
Re: Boierplate macro (Was: Re: ISSUE-139: single implementations of all core constraint components) Dimitris Kontokostas
Re: Boierplate macro (Was: Re: ISSUE-139: single implementations of all core constraint components) Holger Knublauch
Re: Boierplate macro (Was: Re: ISSUE-139: single implementations of all core constraint components) Dimitris Kontokostas

Tuesday, 14 June 2016

Re: Boierplate macro (Was: Re: ISSUE-139: single implementations of all core constraint components) Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-168 (instance count): How to constrain number of instances of a class in a graph [SHACL - Core] Dimitris Kontokostas
ISSUE-41: Suggested results and validator vocabulary changes Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-168 (instance count): How to constrain number of instances of a class in a graph [SHACL - Core] Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-168 (instance count): How to constrain number of instances of a class in a graph [SHACL - Core] Holger Knublauch

Monday, 13 June 2016

Re: shapes-ISSUE-168 (instance count): How to constrain number of instances of a class in a graph [SHACL - Core] Dimitris Kontokostas
Re: shapes-ISSUE-168 (instance count): How to constrain number of instances of a class in a graph [SHACL - Core] Irene Polikoff
Re: scopeNode and scopeClass Irene Polikoff
Re: shapes-ISSUE-168 (instance count): How to constrain number of instances of a class in a graph [SHACL - Core] Karen Coyle
Re: shapes-ISSUE-168 (instance count): How to constrain number of instances of a class in a graph [SHACL - Core] Karen Coyle
Re: scopeNode and scopeClass Karen Coyle
Re: shapes-ISSUE-168 (instance count): How to constrain number of instances of a class in a graph [SHACL - Core] Irene Polikoff
shapes-ISSUE-168 (instance count): How to constrain number of instances of a class in a graph [SHACL - Core] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: scopeNode and scopeClass Irene Polikoff

Sunday, 12 June 2016

Re: scopeNode and scopeClass Karen Coyle
Re: scopeNode and scopeClass Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: scopeNode and scopeClass Dimitris Kontokostas
Re: scopeNode and scopeClass Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: scopeNode and scopeClass Irene Polikoff
Re: scopeNode and scopeClass Karen Coyle
Re: scopeNode and scopeClass Dimitris Kontokostas
need of sh:hasShape (was: Re: ISSUE-68 and ISSUE-131: sh:hasShape and pre-binding) Dimitris Kontokostas
Re: scopeNode and scopeClass Karen Coyle

Saturday, 11 June 2016

Re: ISSUE-68 and ISSUE-131: sh:hasShape and pre-binding Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: ISSUE-68 and ISSUE-131: sh:hasShape and pre-binding Dimitris Kontokostas
Re: ISSUE-22: Suggested revision of wording on recursion Dimitris Kontokostas
Re: ISSUE-139 proposal for today's telco Dimitris Kontokostas

Friday, 10 June 2016

Re: RDF Data Shapes Minutes for 9 June 2016 Holger Knublauch
Re: exiting the working group Arnaud Le Hors
RDF Data Shapes Minutes for 9 June 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
AW: exiting the working group Simon Steyskal
Re: ISSUE-139 proposal for today's telco Peter F. Patel-Schneider
exiting the working group Peter F. Patel-Schneider
ISSUE-68 and ISSUE-131: sh:hasShape and pre-binding Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: ISSUE-139: uniform descriptions and implementations of constraint components Karen Coyle
Boierplate macro (Was: Re: ISSUE-139: single implementations of all core constraint components) Dimitris Kontokostas
Re: ISSUE-139: uniform descriptions and implementations of constraint components Irene Polikoff
scopeNode and scopeClass (was: ISSUE-139: uniform descriptions and implementations of constraint components) Holger Knublauch
Re: ISSUE-139: uniform descriptions and implementations of constraint components Karen Coyle
ISSUE-139: single implementations of all core constraint components Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Thursday, 9 June 2016

Proposal to reopen ISSUE-128 and change resolution (ISSUE-164) Dimitris Kontokostas
Re: ISSUE-139: uniform descriptions and implementations of constraint components Irene Polikoff
Re: RDF Data Shapes agenda for 9 June 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
Re: ISSUE-139: The primary keys use case Irene Polikoff
Re: ISSUE-139: The primary keys use case Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: ISSUE-139: uniform descriptions and implementations of constraint components Peter F. Patel-Schneider
ISSUE-139 proposal for today's telco Dimitris Kontokostas
Re: ISSUE-139: uniform descriptions and implementations of constraint components Karen Coyle
Re: ISSUE-139: uniform descriptions and implementations of constraint components Holger Knublauch
Re: ISSUE-139: uniform descriptions and implementations of constraint components Karen Coyle
Re: ISSUE-139: uniform descriptions and implementations of constraint components Holger Knublauch
Re: ISSUE-139: uniform descriptions and implementations of constraint components Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: RDF Data Shapes agenda for 9 June 2016 Holger Knublauch

Wednesday, 8 June 2016

RDF Data Shapes agenda for 9 June 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
Re: ISSUE-139: uniform descriptions and implementations of constraint components Irene Polikoff
Re: ISSUE-139: uniform descriptions and implementations of constraint components Irene Polikoff
Re: ISSUE-139: uniform descriptions and implementations of constraint components Karen Coyle
Re: ISSUE-139: uniform descriptions and implementations of constraint components Holger Knublauch
Re: ISSUE-139: uniform descriptions and implementations of constraint components Karen Coyle
ISSUE-139: Minimizing development costs by reusing SPARQL code in SHACL functions Holger Knublauch
ISSUE-139: Minimal number of implementations of constraint components Holger Knublauch
Re: ISSUE-139: uniform descriptions and implementations of constraint components Holger Knublauch
Re: ISSUE-139: uniform descriptions and implementations of constraint components Holger Knublauch
ISSUE-139: The primary keys use case Holger Knublauch

Tuesday, 7 June 2016

Re: ISSUE-139: uniform descriptions and implementations of constraint components Dimitris Kontokostas
Re: ISSUE-139: uniform descriptions and implementations of constraint components Holger Knublauch
Re: ISSUE-139: uniform descriptions and implementations of constraint components Dimitris Kontokostas

Monday, 6 June 2016

Re: ISSUE-139: uniform descriptions and implementations of constraint components Holger Knublauch
Re: ISSUE-139: uniform descriptions and implementations of constraint components Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: ISSUE-139: uniform descriptions and implementations of constraint components Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: ISSUE-139: uniform descriptions and implementations of constraint components Dimitris Kontokostas
Re: ISSUE-139: uniform descriptions and implementations of constraint components Irene Polikoff
Re: ISSUE-139: uniform descriptions and implementations of constraint components Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: ISSUE-139: uniform descriptions and implementations of constraint components Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: ISSUE-139: uniform descriptions and implementations of constraint components Dimitris Kontokostas
ISSUE-139: Use case for sh:context in form generation Holger Knublauch
Re: ISSUE-139: uniform descriptions and implementations of constraint components Dimitris Kontokostas
Re: ISSUE-139: uniform descriptions and implementations of constraint components Holger Knublauch
Re: ISSUE-139: uniform descriptions and implementations of constraint components Holger Knublauch

Sunday, 5 June 2016

Re: ISSUE-139: uniform descriptions and implementations of constraint components Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: ISSUE-139: implementing (core) constraint components universally Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: ISSUE-139: uniform descriptions and implementations of constraint components Dimitris Kontokostas
ISSUE-139: uniform descriptions and implementations of constraint components Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: ISSUE-139: implementing (core) constraint components universally Dimitris Kontokostas
Re: ISSUE-139: implementing (core) constraint components universally Holger Knublauch
Re: ISSUE-139: implementing (core) constraint components universally Karen Coyle
Re: ISSUE-139: implementing (core) constraint components universally Holger Knublauch

Saturday, 4 June 2016

Re: ISSUE-139: implementing (core) constraint components universally Karen Coyle
Re: ISSUE-139: implementing (core) constraint components universally Holger Knublauch

Friday, 3 June 2016

Re: ISSUE-139: implementing (core) constraint components universally Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: ISSUE-139: implementing (core) constraint components universally Holger Knublauch
Re: eliminating the need for three SPARQL queries for constraint components Holger Knublauch

Thursday, 2 June 2016

eliminating the need for three SPARQL queries for constraint components Peter F. Patel-Schneider
ISSUE-41: Yet another take on property paths Holger Knublauch
ISSUE-139: implementing (core) constraint components universally Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 2 June 2016 Arnaud Le Hors

Wednesday, 1 June 2016

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 2 June 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
New SHACL draft published Arnaud Le Hors

Last message date: Thursday, 30 June 2016 17:48:09 UTC