Re: RDF Data Shapes agenda for 9 June 2016

On 9/06/2016 7:12, Arnaud Le Hors wrote:
> Here is the agenda for this week's call. Given the traffic around 
> issue-139 and its potential impact on the spec I expect it to take 
> most of our time but feel free to point out other issues you think we 
> could make progress on.

I believe ISSUE-139 is highly impacted by ISSUE-41 which has been 
unresolved for a while now. I believe it would be good to decide (one 
way or another) whether and how property paths are to be supported. It 
is related to ISSUE-139 because having path validators would lead to 
fewer SPARQL queries, but it would also open a fourth type of 
constraints. In a demo to a customer today I also received more evidence 
that path-based constraints would be a useful feature to have, so I'll 
vote +1 for their inclusion, e.g. similar to

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-data-shapes-wg/2016Jun/0004.html

Holger


> Thanks.
>
> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2016.06.09
> --
> Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies 
> - IBM Cloud
>