- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:57:28 -0700
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
OK, let me persist here. We have the suggested code example of:
ex:MyShape
a sh:Shape ;
sh:scopeNode schema:FlightReservation ;
sh:constraint [
sh:minInstanceCount 1 ;
sh:maxInstanceCount 1 ;
] .
I'm going to abstract this as:
ex:MyShape
a sh:Shape ;
sh:scopeNode ex:A ;
sh:constraint [
sh:minInstanceCount 1 ;
sh:maxInstanceCount 1 ;
] .
Given the examples below, which of these are in scope for "sh:scopeNode
ex:A"
ex:A ex:B ex:C .
ex:B ex:A ex:C .
ex:B ex:C ex:A .
kc
On 6/17/16 4:43 PM, Irene Polikoff wrote:
> Also, I donšt think the below is right. I thought that the scope
> identifies nodes. Not subject or objects, just nodes.
>
> Then, constraints specify conditions or patterns to be specified. Focus
> nodes can be either an object or a subject in these patterns. For example,
> when a PropertyConstraint is used focus nodes are subjects, but an
> InverseProperty constraint specifically allows specifying patterns where
> focus nodes are objects.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 6/17/16, 1:10 PM, "Karen Coyle" <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> wrote:
>
>> nd scopeNode binds to the subject of a
>> triple, AFAI can determine.
>
>
>
--
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2016 18:58:00 UTC