- From: Olivier Thereaux <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 07:28:25 -0700
- To: WebAudio/web-audio-api <web-audio-api@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2013 14:30:46 UTC
> Originally reported on W3C Bugzilla [ISSUE-17415](https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17415) Tue, 05 Jun 2012 12:43:20 GMT > Reported by Michael[tm] Smith > Assigned to Audio-ISSUE-107 (JSWorkers): JavaScriptAudioNode processing in workers [Web Audio API] http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/track/issues/107 Raised by: Marcus Geelnard On product: Web Audio API https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/audio/raw-file/tip/webaudio/specification.html#JavaScriptAudioNode It has been discussed before (see [1] and [2], for instance), but I could not find an issue for it, so here goes: The JavaScriptAudioNode should do its processing in a separate context (e.g. a worker) rather than in the main thread/context. It could potentially mean very low overhead for JavaScript-based audio processing, and seems to be a fundamental requirement for making the JavaScriptAudioNode really useful. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2012JanMar/0225.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2012JanMar/0245.html --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/113
Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2013 14:30:46 UTC