Re: [web-audio-api] (JSWorkers): ScriptProcessorNode processing in workers (#113)

> [Original comment](https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17415#61) by Olivier Thereaux on W3C Bugzilla. Fri, 27 Jul 2012 11:14:16 GMT

(In reply to [comment #59](#issuecomment-24244648))
> Would the following be a correct conclusion?:
> 
> - Audio processing in JavaScript should be done in workers.
[…]

I think that is a reasonable conclusion, yes - although there may be objections by e.g Philip who seemed to be quite adamant about it (See Comment #2). 

Any more suggestions on how this could be made obvious to developers (as you mentioned in Comment #4)? Would it suffice to have the default interface be constructed in the way suggested by Chris in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2012JanMar/0225.html - and requiring a conscious choice *not* to use a worker?

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/113#issuecomment-24244667