ietf-http-wg@w3.org from January to March 2025 by author

Anders Rundgren

• Re: [media-types] Re: Rethinking Media Types (Sunday, 12 January)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: Delete-Cookie header?? (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: Delete-Cookie header?? (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix? (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: Delete-Cookie header?? (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix? (Wednesday, 19 February)

Asbjørn Ulsberg

• Re: HATEOAS on demand (Wednesday, 15 January)

Barry Leiba via Datatracker

• Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-03 (Thursday, 13 February)

Ben Schwartz

• New Draft: Forward and Reverse HTTP/3 over WebTransport (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8441 (8250) (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: How to discover a WHEP URL (Monday, 6 January)
• Re: POST+Upgrade, or unexpected limitation of RFC8441 (Thursday, 2 January)

Carsten Bormann

• Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8441 (8250) (Tuesday, 14 January)

Chris Fredrickson

• Re: Request to register 2 new HTTP field names (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Request to register 2 new HTTP field names (Tuesday, 4 February)

Claudio Allocchio via Datatracker

• Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-19 (Saturday, 15 February)

Dale Worley via Datatracker

• Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-19 (Monday, 10 February)

Daniel Stenberg

• Re: Delete-Cookie header?? (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis - preliminary questions for IETF dnsdir review (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: Delete-Cookie header?? (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: Delete-Cookie header?? (Monday, 24 February)

Daniel Veditz

• Re: Delete-Cookie header?? (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: Delete-Cookie header?? (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: Delete-Cookie header?? (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: Delete-Cookie header?? (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix? (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix? (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix? (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix? (Wednesday, 19 February)

Darrel Miller

• Re: [media-types] Rethinking Media Types (Saturday, 11 January)

Darrel Miller via Datatracker

• Httpdir early review of draft-kowalik-domainconnect-00 (Monday, 3 February)

David Dong via RT

• [IANA #1412905] expert review for draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups (http-fields) (Monday, 24 February)
• [IANA #1412905] expert review for draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups (http-fields) (Friday, 14 February)

David Schinazi

• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-wrap-up-00.txt (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-schinazi-httpbis-wrap-up (Thursday, 9 January)

Deb Cooley via Datatracker

• Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-19: (with COMMENT) (Thursday, 13 February)

Eduardo Costa

• About bcp47 (Friday, 10 January)

Francesca Palombini

• Open errata on RFC 6265 (Tuesday, 28 January)
• AD Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-19 (Tuesday, 28 January)

Glenn Strauss

• Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Response for unsupported conditional request (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Response for unsupported conditional request (Saturday, 1 February)
• Re: [media-types] Re: Rethinking Media Types (Saturday, 11 January)
• Re: [media-types] Rethinking Media Types (Friday, 10 January)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-wrap-up-00.txt (Thursday, 9 January)

Graham Cox

• Re: HATEOAS on demand (Wednesday, 15 January)
• Re: [media-types] Rethinking Media Types (Thursday, 9 January)

Harald Alvestrand

• Re: HATEOAS on demand (Monday, 20 January)

IETF Meeting Session Request Tool

• httpbis - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 122 (Wednesday, 8 January)

internet-drafts@ietf.org

• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-safe-method-w-body-08.txt (Tuesday, 25 February)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-03.txt (Tuesday, 11 February)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-wrap-up-00.txt (Thursday, 9 January)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-19.txt (Tuesday, 7 January)

Jeffrey Yasskin

• Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-03 (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: Request to register 2 new HTTP field names (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: Request to register 2 new HTTP field names (Wednesday, 5 February)

Johann Hofmann

• Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix? (Wednesday, 19 February)

John Scudder via Datatracker

• John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-19: (with COMMENT) (Thursday, 20 February)

Julian Reschke

• Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-03 (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: Delete-Cookie header?? (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-03.txt> (HTTP Cache Groups) to Proposed Standard (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (8268) (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: Identifying versions in draft-toomim-httpbis-versions , was: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning) (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: Identifying versions in draft-toomim-httpbis-versions , was: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning) (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: Identifying versions in draft-toomim-httpbis-versions , was: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning) (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: Identifying versions in draft-toomim-httpbis-versions , was: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning) (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: Identifying versions in draft-toomim-httpbis-versions , was: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning) (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: Identifying versions in draft-toomim-httpbis-versions , was: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning) (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Response for unsupported conditional request (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Identifying versions in draft-toomim-httpbis-versions , was: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning) (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning) (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Response for unsupported conditional request (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: Request to register 2 new HTTP field names (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Response for unsupported conditional request (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: Response for unsupported conditional request (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: Response for unsupported conditional request (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: Response for unsupported conditional request (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (8268) (Tuesday, 28 January)

Kevin Marks

• Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Response for unsupported conditional request (Wednesday, 5 February)

Lucas Pardue

• Re: Client Hints Reliability Drafts (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: Client Hints Reliability Drafts (Tuesday, 25 February)

Marco Tiloca via Datatracker

• Artart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-03 (Tuesday, 25 February)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-03 (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-03 (Monday, 24 February)
• DRAFT agenda for IETF 122 Bangkok (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-03 (Saturday, 15 February)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis - preliminary questions for IETF dnsdir review (Saturday, 15 February)
• Re: Request to register 2 new HTTP field names (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: Request to register 2 new HTTP field names (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: Request to register 2 new HTTP field names (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: Response for unsupported conditional request (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis - preliminary questions for IETF dnsdir review (Saturday, 25 January)
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9111 (8259) (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8441 (8250) (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-kazuho-httpbis-incremental-http (Thursday, 2 January)

Mark Nottingham via Datatracker

• Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-19 (Tuesday, 7 January)

Martin J. Dürst

• Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Response for unsupported conditional request (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Response for unsupported conditional request (Sunday, 2 February)
• Re: Response for unsupported conditional request (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: About bcp47 (Saturday, 11 January)

Martin Thomson

• Re: [Last-Call] Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-03.txt> (HTTP Cache Groups) to Proposed Standard (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Response for unsupported conditional request (Tuesday, 4 February)

Martin Thomson via Datatracker

• Httpdir last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-browser-based-apps-22 (Thursday, 30 January)

Matt Metzger

• Re: Delete-Cookie header?? (Monday, 24 February)

Melvin Carvalho

• Re: [media-types] Re: Rethinking Media Types (Monday, 13 January)
• Re: [media-types] Re: Rethinking Media Types (Saturday, 11 January)

Michael Jones

• RE: [media-types] Rethinking Media Types (Thursday, 9 January)

Michael Toomim

• Re: Identifying versions in draft-toomim-httpbis-versions , was: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning) (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: Identifying versions in draft-toomim-httpbis-versions , was: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning) (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: Identifying versions in draft-toomim-httpbis-versions , was: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning) (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: Identifying versions in draft-toomim-httpbis-versions , was: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning) (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: Identifying versions in draft-toomim-httpbis-versions , was: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning) (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: Identifying versions in draft-toomim-httpbis-versions , was: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning) (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: Identifying versions in draft-toomim-httpbis-versions , was: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning) (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: Identifying versions in draft-toomim-httpbis-versions , was: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning) (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning) (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning) (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning) (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning) (Wednesday, 5 February)

Mike Bishop

• RE: POST+Upgrade, or unexpected limitation of RFC8441 (Wednesday, 8 January)

Mike Kistler

• Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Response for unsupported conditional request (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Response for unsupported conditional request (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Response for unsupported conditional request (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Response for unsupported conditional request (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Response for unsupported conditional request (Friday, 31 January)
• Response for unsupported conditional request (Monday, 27 January)

Mike Taylor

• Re: Delete-Cookie header?? (Monday, 24 February)

Mondain

• Re: [Wish] Re: How to discover a WHEP URL (Monday, 6 January)

Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker

• Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-19: (with COMMENT) (Thursday, 20 February)

Nils Ohlmeier

• How to discover a WHEP URL (Friday, 3 January)

Orie Steele via Datatracker

• Orie Steele's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-19: (with COMMENT) (Monday, 17 February)

Owen Rubel

• Re: HATEOAS on demand (Wednesday, 15 January)
• Re: HATEOAS on demand (Wednesday, 15 January)
• Re: HATEOAS on demand (Wednesday, 15 January)
• Re: HATEOAS on demand (Wednesday, 15 January)
• HATEOAS on demand (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: [media-types] Rethinking Media Types (Friday, 10 January)
• Re: [media-types] Rethinking Media Types (Thursday, 9 January)

Paul Kyzivat

• Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-03 (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-03 (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-03 (Monday, 24 February)

Paul Wouters via Datatracker

• Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-19: (with COMMENT) (Thursday, 20 February)

Petr Špaček via Datatracker

• Dnsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-19 (Monday, 17 February)

Rahul Gupta

• Re: HATEOAS on demand (Wednesday, 15 January)
• Re: [media-types] Re: Rethinking Media Types (Saturday, 11 January)
• Re: [media-types] Re: Rethinking Media Types (Saturday, 11 January)
• Re: [media-types] Re: Rethinking Media Types (Saturday, 11 January)
• Re: [media-types] Re: Rethinking Media Types (Friday, 10 January)
• Re: [media-types] Rethinking Media Types (Friday, 10 January)
• RE: [media-types] Rethinking Media Types (Thursday, 9 January)
• Rethinking Media Types (Tuesday, 7 January)

RFC Errata System

• [Errata Verified] RFC9112 (8284) (Thursday, 6 February)
• [Errata Verified] RFC9110 (8268) (Thursday, 6 February)
• [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9112 (8284) (Thursday, 6 February)
• [Errata Verified] RFC9530 (8273) (Thursday, 6 February)
• [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9530 (8273) (Thursday, 30 January)
• [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (8268) (Tuesday, 28 January)
• [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9111 (8259) (Thursday, 23 January)
• [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8441 (8250) (Tuesday, 21 January)
• [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8441 (8250) (Tuesday, 14 January)
• [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7541 (8228) (Thursday, 2 January)

rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org

• RFC 9729 on The Concealed HTTP Authentication Scheme (Friday, 14 February)
• Moved to Proposed Standard: RFC 8297 on An HTTP Status Code for Indicating Hints (Friday, 7 February)

Roman Danyliw via Datatracker

• Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-19: (with COMMENT) (Monday, 17 February)

Rory Hewitt

• Re: Delete-Cookie header?? (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix? (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix? (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix? (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix? (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix? (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix? (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Response for unsupported conditional request (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Response for unsupported conditional request (Tuesday, 4 February)

Roy T. Fielding

• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-03.txt> (HTTP Cache Groups) to Proposed Standard (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [IANA #1412905] expert review for draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups (http-fields) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: Dnsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-19 (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: Response for unsupported conditional request (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: HATEOAS on demand (Wednesday, 15 January)
• Re: [media-types] Rethinking Media Types (Thursday, 9 January)

Sergio Garcia Murillo

• Re: [Wish] Re: How to discover a WHEP URL (Monday, 6 January)

Steven Bingler

• Re: Open errata on RFC 6265 (Monday, 3 February)

The IESG

• Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-03.txt> (HTTP Cache Groups) to Proposed Standard (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-19.txt> (Cookies: HTTP State Management Mechanism) to Proposed Standard (Tuesday, 28 January)

Tim Bray

• Re: [media-types] Re: Rethinking Media Types (Saturday, 11 January)

Tommy Pauly

• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-schinazi-httpbis-wrap-up (Wednesday, 8 January)

Tommy Pauly via Datatracker

• Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-03 (Tuesday, 11 February)

Valery Smyslov via Datatracker

• Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-19 (Tuesday, 11 February)

Victor Tan

• Re: Client Hints Reliability Drafts (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Client Hints Reliability Drafts (Tuesday, 25 February)

Warren Kumari via Datatracker

• Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-19: (with COMMENT) (Thursday, 13 February)

Willy Tarreau

• Re: Interoperability concern around :authority in RFC9113 (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Response for unsupported conditional request (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Response for unsupported conditional request (Saturday, 1 February)
• Re: Response for unsupported conditional request (Thursday, 30 January)

Yoav Weiss

• Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix? (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix? (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix? (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: Delete-Cookie header?? (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix? (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: Delete-Cookie header?? (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix? (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: Delete-Cookie header?? (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix? (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix? (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix? (Thursday, 20 February)
• _HttpOnly cookie prefix? (Wednesday, 19 February)

Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker

• Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-19: (with COMMENT) (Tuesday, 18 February)

Éric Vyncke via Datatracker

• Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-19: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Monday, 17 February)

Last message date: Thursday, 27 February 2025 00:29:30 UTC