- From: Soni \ <fakedme+ietf@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 20:40:20 -0300
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
hey y'all, can we make this into an april fools rfc yet? (tho, this seems like it would be somewhat difficult to turn into a proper april fools rfc...) On 2023-08-14 13:32, Soni L. wrote: > Let's say your server is sending a redirect to another page on the > same server > > GET /whatever HTTP/1.1 > ... > > 302 Found > Location: /something > > > Instead of waiting for the client to send the follow-up request, why > not just send it straight away? > > 302 Found > Location: /actually > > > 200 OK > ... > > This is different from server push in that it relies on making > assumptions about how the client behaves, and it works with HTTP/1.1 > too. The User-Agent header and some other fingerprinting techniques > might be necessary for sending the right thing tho. -- plural system (tend to say 'we'), it/she/they, it instead of you
Received on Monday, 10 March 2025 23:40:32 UTC