- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 10:29:03 +0100
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 05.02.2025 10:12, Michael Toomim wrote: > Julian: > > On 2/5/25 1:01 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: >> (only commenting on excerpts related to Option 2) >> A version *is* a resource. You are conflating multiple concepts: > > Option 1 is the model where you assume that a version *is* a resource. > If you want to make that assumption, please refer to Option 1. > > In Option 2, we no longer assume that a version is a resource. > ... As I explained, a version *is* a resource. In your explanation, the URI for it is optional. But the fact that it *can* have a URI by definition means that it *is* resource. Please read the beginning of RFC 3986. Best regards, Julian PS: it seems we keep exchanging the same arguments. It would really be helpful if other WG members would provide feedback.
Received on Wednesday, 5 February 2025 09:29:09 UTC