- From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 04:25:41 -0800 (PST)
- To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
- Cc: pluknet@gmail.com, fielding@gbiv.com, mnot@mnot.net, julian.reschke@greenbytes.de, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9110, "HTTP Semantics". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8268 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Sergey Kandaurov <pluknet@gmail.com> Section: B.2 Original Text ------------- The priority of the absolute form of the request URI over the Host header field by origin servers has been made explicit to align with proxy handling. (Section 7.2) Corrected Text -------------- [[ Move to RFC 9112, Appendix C.3 ]] The priority of the absolute form of the request URI over the Host header field by origin servers has been made explicit to align with proxy handling. (Section 3.2.2) Notes ----- Section 7.2 doesn't discuss the absolute form, the link appears broken. After the referred text was moved between RFC-to-be 9110 and 9112 [1], this item from "Changes from 7230" was not caught up. [1] https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/commit/e47483b5 Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC9110 (draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-19) -------------------------------------- Title : HTTP Semantics Publication Date : June 2022 Author(s) : R. Fielding, Ed., M. Nottingham, Ed., J. Reschke, Ed. Category : INTERNET STANDARD Source : HTTP Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
Received on Tuesday, 28 January 2025 12:25:46 UTC