- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 08:18:30 +1100
- To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
- Cc: httpbis-ads@ietf.org, tpauly@apple.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
This is spam; REJECT. > On 24 Jan 2025, at 8:17 am, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9111, > "HTTP Caching". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8259 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: ELelyon Rapha Bradford <bradfordbrandon2007@gmail.com> > > Section: Section no.2 > > Original Text > ------------- > *Linux/Unix* > dig <DOMAIN_NAME> +trace @1.1.1.1 > dig <DOMAIN_NAME> +trace @8.8.8.8 > > *Windows* > nslookup <DOMAIN_NAME> 1.1.1.1 > nslookup <DOMAIN_NAME> 8.8.8.8 > saanvi.ns.cloudflare.com > moura.ns.cloudflare.com > > Corrected Text > -------------- > *Linux/Unix* > dig <DOMAIN_NAME> +trace @1.1.1.1 > dig <DOMAIN_NAME> +trace @8.8.8.8 > > *Windows* > nslookup <DOMAIN_NAME> 1.1.1.1 > nslookup <DOMAIN_NAME> 8.8.8.8 > saanvi.ns.cloudflare.com > moura.ns.cloudflare.com > > Notes > ----- > Here is a real good reason: > IAM ERRATA > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it > will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC9111 (draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-19) > -------------------------------------- > Title : HTTP Caching > Publication Date : June 2022 > Author(s) : R. Fielding, Ed., M. Nottingham, Ed., J. Reschke, Ed. > Category : INTERNET STANDARD > Source : HTTP > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 23 January 2025 21:18:39 UTC