- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 01:47:17 +0600
- To: "WS-Desc WG \(Public\)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
I posted this a while back, but there was literally no discussion that I can recall. Is this issue so boring?? Also related is the following: <issue id="issue-multiple-services"> <head>Should a single WSDL file only define one service?</head> WSDL 1.1 suppports having multiple services in a single WSDL file. This has caused confusion amongst users. <source>Sanjiva Weerawarana</source> </issue> Anyone with opinions or can I resolve it myself? ;-) Sanjiva. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com> To: "WS-Desc WG (Public)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 6:29 AM Subject: issue: service type > I would like to open discussion on the following issue: > > <issue id="issue-service-type"> > <head>Should we have an abstract view of a service?</head> > WSDL defines a service as a collection of ports, but there is no > abstract analog. > <source>Sanjiva Weerawarana</source> > </issue> > > > Sanjiva. >
Received on Tuesday, 4 June 2002 15:47:53 UTC