- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 01:47:17 +0600
- To: "WS-Desc WG \(Public\)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
I posted this a while back, but there was literally no discussion
that I can recall. Is this issue so boring??
Also related is the following:
<issue id="issue-multiple-services">
<head>Should a single WSDL file only define one service?</head>
WSDL 1.1 suppports having multiple services in a single WSDL
file. This has caused confusion amongst users.
<source>Sanjiva Weerawarana</source>
</issue>
Anyone with opinions or can I resolve it myself? ;-)
Sanjiva.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
To: "WS-Desc WG (Public)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 6:29 AM
Subject: issue: service type
> I would like to open discussion on the following issue:
>
> <issue id="issue-service-type">
> <head>Should we have an abstract view of a service?</head>
> WSDL defines a service as a collection of ports, but there is no
> abstract analog.
> <source>Sanjiva Weerawarana</source>
> </issue>
>
>
> Sanjiva.
>
Received on Tuesday, 4 June 2002 15:47:53 UTC