ACTION: All WG members to review redundancy issues by next week

In reconciling issues lists, Sanjiva found a number of issues that he
deemed duplicate or obsolete.  To expedite resolving these issues, next
week we will close as a group those issues that have received no
substantial comment.  Please review these issues by next week and be
prepared to identify any that should not be closed.  To date, issue 26
has been identified as needing further discussion.

Duplicate/redundant issues identified by Sanjiva:
  No controversy:
  - Issue 60: Text in the WSDL spec inconsistency about optional 
              parts [21]
  - Issue 57: Should Operations permit alternate and multiple 
              responses? [22]
  - Issue 43: Does order matter for the child elements of 
              "definitions"? [23]
  - Issue 38: Clarify the what kinds of extensibility elements go 
              where [24]
  - Issue 37: Should we remove parameter order? [25]
  - Issue 36: Should we remove notification operations? [26]
  - Issue 35: Should we remove solicit-response operations? [26]
  - Issue 34: Should portTypes be extensible? [27]
  - Issue "issue-clarify elements" [29]
  - Issue 42: Shall "element" attribute of "part" only refer to 
                elements defined in schema? [30]

  Some discussion:
  - Issue 26: Transmission primitives [28], [31]

[21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0111.html
[22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0112.html
[23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0113.html
[24] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0114.html
[25] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0115.html
[26] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0116.html
[27] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0117.html
[28] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0118.html
[29] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0120.html
[30] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0121.html
[31] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0137.html

Received on Thursday, 20 June 2002 18:51:17 UTC