wai-eo-editors@w3.org from September 2005 by author

Andrew Arch

• FW: Business Case on W3C (Monday, 19 September)
• RE: [wbs] Andrew Arch response to 'EOWG Call for Review: Evaluation Resource Suite, 2005 September' (Thursday, 15 September)
• [Draft] Selecting Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools (Friday, 9 September)
• [Draft] Conformance Evaluation of Web Sites for Accessibility (Friday, 9 September)
• WAI Resources on Managing Accessibility (Friday, 9 September)
• [Draft] Considerations for Specific Contexts (Friday, 9 September)
• [Draft] Preliminary Review of Web Sites for Accessibility (Friday, 9 September)

Giuliano

• Broken link in a page (Thursday, 8 September)

Ian B. Jacobs

• Re: [Fwd: Misspelling of a Language on ISO 639 Reference Page] (Wednesday, 21 September)

kunter ilalan

• regarding your quick tips page (Saturday, 24 September)

Pasquale Popolizio

• Re: implemented minor suggestions from Pasquale to Evaluation Suite (Thursday, 15 September)

Roberto Castaldo

• R: R: [wbs] Roberto Castaldo response to 'EOWG Call for Review: Evaluation Resource Suite, 2005 September' (Friday, 16 September)
• R: [wbs] Roberto Castaldo response to 'EOWG Call for Review: Evaluation Resource Suite, 2005 September' (Friday, 16 September)

Sailesh Panchang

• Re: Re: for content review: Involving Users in Evaluating Web Accessibility] (Friday, 30 September)
• Eval suite review (Friday, 16 September)

Shadi Abou-Zahra

• [Fwd: Fwd: 50no, 10no (largeprint), 10no (braillecard), EuropeAfrica, < ca. 7th November 2005] (Wednesday, 21 September)
• Re: [Fwd: Misspelling of a Language on ISO 639 Reference Page] (Wednesday, 21 September)
• Re: Eval suite review (Friday, 16 September)
• Re: R: [wbs] Roberto Castaldo response to 'EOWG Call for Review: Evaluation Resource Suite, 2005 September' (Friday, 16 September)
• implemented minor suggestions from Shawn to Evaluation Suite (Friday, 16 September)
• Re: [wbs] Roberto Castaldo response to 'EOWG Call for Review: Evaluation Resource Suite, 2005 September' (Friday, 16 September)
• Re: [wbs] Henk Snetselaar response to 'EOWG Call for Review: Evaluation Resource Suite, 2005 September' (Friday, 16 September)
• implemented minor suggestions from Pasquale to Evaluation Suite (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: [wbs] Andrew Arch response to 'EOWG Call for Review: Evaluation Resource Suite, 2005 September' (Wednesday, 14 September)
• implemented minor changes to Evaluation Suite (Monday, 12 September)

Shawn Henry

• Re: EOWG: Review this week: Evaluating with Users (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: for content review: Involving Users in Evaluating Web Accessibility (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: for content review: Involving Users in Evaluating Web Accessibility (Wednesday, 28 September)
• [Fwd: Re: for content review: Involving Users in Evaluating Web Accessibility] (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: for content review: Involving Users in Evaluating Web Accessibility (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: for content review: Involving Users in Evaluating Web Accessibility (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: [Fwd: Fwd: 50no, 10no (largeprint), 10no (braillecard), EuropeAfrica, < ca. 7th November 2005] (Monday, 26 September)
• [Fwd: Misspelling of a Language on ISO 639 Reference Page] (Wednesday, 21 September)
• Re: FW: Business Case on W3C (Monday, 19 September)
• Selecting Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools (Friday, 9 September)
• copyedits on Evaluation pages (Friday, 9 September)
• checking in on EOWG (Thursday, 8 September)

Sutjahjo, Heru

• WCAG 2.0 (Wednesday, 28 September)

WBS Mailer on behalf of

• [wbs] Harvey Bingham response to 'EOWG Call for Review: Evaluation Resource Suite, 2005 September' (Friday, 16 September)
• [wbs] Justin Thorp response to 'EOWG Call for Review: Evaluation Resource Suite, 2005 September' (Friday, 16 September)
• [wbs] Shadi Abou-Zahra response to 'EOWG Call for Review: Evaluation Resource Suite, 2005 September' (Thursday, 15 September)
• [wbs] Shawn Henry response to 'EOWG Call for Review: Evaluation Resource Suite, 2005 September' (Thursday, 15 September)
• [wbs] Shawn Henry response to 'EOWG Call for Review: Evaluation Resource Suite, 2005 September' (Thursday, 15 September)
• [wbs] Roberto Castaldo response to 'EOWG Call for Review: Evaluation Resource Suite, 2005 September' (Thursday, 15 September)
• [wbs] Henk Snetselaar response to 'EOWG Call for Review: Evaluation Resource Suite, 2005 September' (Thursday, 15 September)
• [wbs] Jack Welsh response to 'EOWG Call for Review: Evaluation Resource Suite, 2005 September' (Thursday, 15 September)
• [wbs] Pasquale Popolizio response to 'EOWG Call for Review: Evaluation Resource Suite, 2005 September' (Wednesday, 14 September)
• [wbs] Andrew Arch response to 'EOWG Call for Review: Evaluation Resource Suite, 2005 September' (Wednesday, 14 September)
• [wbs] Wayne Dick response to 'EOWG Call for Review: Evaluation Resource Suite, 2005 September' (Tuesday, 13 September)
• [wbs] Wayne Dick response to 'EOWG Call for Review: Evaluation Resource Suite, 2005 September' (Tuesday, 13 September)
• [wbs] Wayne Dick response to 'EOWG Call for Review: Evaluation Resource Suite, 2005 September' (Tuesday, 13 September)
• [wbs] Alan Chuter response to 'EOWG Call for Review: Evaluation Resource Suite, 2005 September' (Tuesday, 13 September)
• [wbs] Tanguy Loheac response to 'EOWG Call for Review: Evaluation Resource Suite, 2005 September' (Tuesday, 13 September)
• [wbs] Johanna Bolton response to 'EOWG Call for Review: Evaluation Resource Suite, 2005 September' (Tuesday, 13 September)
• [wbs] William Loughborough response to 'EOWG Call for Review: Evaluation Resource Suite, 2005 September' (Monday, 12 September)
• [wbs] Shawn Henry response to 'EOWG Call for Review: Evaluation Resource Suite, 2005 September' (Monday, 12 September)

Last message date: Friday, 30 September 2005 22:29:28 UTC