W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > wai-eo-editors@w3.org > September 2005

Re: for content review: Involving Users in Evaluating Web Accessibility

From: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:24:13 -0500
Message-ID: <433AC3AD.4010104@w3.org>
To: Pasquale Popolizio <pasquale@osservatoriosullacomunicazione.com>
Cc: wai-eo-editors <wai-eo-editors@w3.org>

Thanks, Pasquale! I implemented all of your suggestions (in a version to be posted later today).

~ Shawn

Pasquale Popolizio wrote:
> Hi Shawn,
> hi all.
> 
> I really agree with you; the draft is well organised ;-)
> 
> The few changes I'd suggest, are about the wording "include",  
> "included", "including" to change to "involve", "involved", "involving".
> Just because I like document titles like "User involvement in  
> evaluating Web accessibility" and "Involving users in evaluating Web  
> accessibility".
> 
> 
> Below, only two suggestions about wording:
> 
> * priority: [editor's discretion]
> * location: second paragraph, first list item
> * current wording: "Informal evaluation of a specific accessibility  
> issue can be as simple as asking a person down the hall who uses a  
> screen reader...
> * my comment: I don't know what "a person down the hall" means
> 
> 
> * priority: [editor's discretion]
> * location: third paragraph, very last sentence
> * current wording: "Be careful not to assume that all users,  including 
> users with disabilities, use your product the same way.
> * suggested revision: "Be careful not to assume that all users,  
> including users with disabilities, use user agents or assistive  
> technologies the same way.
> 
> 
> 
> regards
> ciao
> 
> pasquale
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Il giorno 16/set/05, alle ore 19:33, Shawn Henry ha scritto:
> 
>>
>> EOWG,
>>
>> We had a good discussion in today's EOWG teleconference about the  
>> "Involving Users in Evaluating Web Accessibility" document (title  
>> still under development). Draft minutes and changelog items are  
>> available at:
>>     http://www.w3.org/2005/09/16-eo-minutes.html#item04
>>
>> Based on that discussion, it seems the current draft is very close  on 
>> overall content and organization, and the remaining work is  mostly at 
>> the "wordsmithing" level. Therefore, please complete a  content review 
>> in the upcoming week and send any content comments  to the EOWG list by:
>>     Monday 26 September
>>
>> I encourage you to send comments earlier and discuss them on the list.
>> ...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2005 16:24:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 12 January 2010 00:13:12 GMT