Hi Shadi, http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/eval/selectingtools.html#features Some comments re Section 4 1. What about linking to the EARL doc from the bit on "data export"? 2. "accessibility" bit says "Evaluation tool vendors can provide accessibility in all parts of a tool" - many tools do not have vendors per-se, so what about changing to "Evaluation tool developers and vendors can provide accessibility in all parts of a tool" 3. In the "reliability" bit: "reporting in-existent barriers" should read "reporting non-existent barriers" Cheers, Andrew Also note that all the footers in the new DRAFTS have [contact wai] on a separate line - seems odd?? _________________________________ Dr Andrew Arch Manager Online Accessibility Consulting Accessible Information Solutions, NILS Ph +61 (0)3 9864 9282; Fax +61 (0)3 9864 9370; Mobile 0438 755 565 http://www.accessibleinfo.org.au/ | http://www.ozewai.org/2005/ Member, Education & Outreach Working Group, W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/ National Information & Library Service Vision Australia __________________________________________________________________ << ella for Spam Control >> has removed Spam messages and set aside Later for me You can use it too - and it's FREE! http://www.ellaforspam.comReceived on Friday, 9 September 2005 14:54:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 5 June 2007 18:09:41 GMT