W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > wai-eo-editors@w3.org > September 2005

[Draft] Selecting Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools

From: Andrew Arch <andrew.arch@nils.org.au>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 00:54:09 +1000
To: <wai-eo-editors@w3.org>
Cc: "Shadi Abou-Zahra \(E-mail\)" <shadi@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00a501c5b54e$55c704f0$6601a8c0@yourdh7axfhyur>

Hi Shadi,


Some comments re Section 4

1. What about linking to the EARL doc from the bit on "data export"?

2. "accessibility" bit says "Evaluation tool vendors can provide
accessibility in all parts of a tool" - many tools do not have vendors
per-se, so what about changing to "Evaluation tool developers and vendors
can provide accessibility in all parts of a tool"

3. In the "reliability" bit: "reporting in-existent barriers" should read
"reporting non-existent barriers"

Cheers, Andrew

Also note that all the footers in the new DRAFTS have [contact wai] on a
separate line - seems odd??
Dr Andrew Arch
Manager Online Accessibility Consulting
Accessible Information Solutions, NILS
Ph +61 (0)3 9864 9282; Fax +61 (0)3 9864 9370; Mobile 0438 755 565
http://www.accessibleinfo.org.au/ | http://www.ozewai.org/2005/

Member, Education & Outreach Working Group,
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative

National Information & Library Service
Vision Australia

<< ella for Spam Control >> has removed Spam messages and set aside Later
for me
You can use it too - and it's FREE!  http://www.ellaforspam.com
Received on Friday, 9 September 2005 14:54:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:25:17 UTC