xml-encryption@w3.org from October 2000 by author

Blair Dillaway

• RE: comments on "Note on XML Encryption" (Friday, 27 October)
• comments on "Note on XML Encryption" (Thursday, 26 October)

Chris Boothe

• Encryption (Saturday, 28 October)

Christian Geuer-Pollmann

• Re: XML Encryption: A third proposal (with attachment) (Tuesday, 31 October)
• XML Encryption: A third proposal (with attachment) (Monday, 30 October)
• XML Encryption: A third proposal (Monday, 30 October)

Ed Simon

• RE: XmlEncryptor - An XML Encryption Demonstrator (with ZIP file) (Monday, 30 October)
• RE: XmlEncryptor - An XML Encryption Demonstrator (Monday, 30 October)
• XmlEncryptor - An XML Encryption Demonstrator (Sunday, 29 October)
• RE: Review of "Note on XML Encryption" (Friday, 27 October)
• RE: Review of "Note on XML Encryption" (Thursday, 26 October)
• Review of "Note on XML Encryption" (Wednesday, 25 October)
• RE: proposed approach to XML encryption (Friday, 20 October)

eric.e.cohen@us.pwcglobal.com

• More XML Encryption questions and issues ... (Friday, 20 October)

Ernesto Damiani

• R: R: proposed approach to XML encryption (Tuesday, 24 October)
• R: proposed approach to XML encryption (Saturday, 21 October)

Fikkert, Dick W.

• Demonstrator sXML available (Sunday, 29 October)
• Re: Towards secure XML (sXML) (Saturday, 28 October)

Hiroshi Maruyama

• Re: Encrypting Elements and Transclusion (Monday, 16 October)

John.Payne@health.gov.au

• Seeking help with developing a consumer privacy and confidentiality electronic signature attribute (Wednesday, 25 October)

Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

• XML Encryption: A third proposal (with attachment) (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Agenda, Requirements (Was: XmlEncryptor) (Monday, 30 October)
• Re: Suggestions for requirements ... (Monday, 30 October)
• Re: Towards secure XML (sXML) (Monday, 30 October)
• "Note on XML Encryption" and Property (Friday, 27 October)
• Re: Towards secure XML (sXML) (Friday, 27 October)
• Re: Problem: How to encrypt nodes without breaking parsers (Friday, 27 October)
• Re: Suggestions for requirements ... (Friday, 27 October)
• Re: R: R: proposed approach to XML encryption (Tuesday, 24 October)
• Very Rough Agenda for Encryption Workshop (Monday, 23 October)
• Re: proposed approach to XML encryption (Friday, 20 October)
• Encrypting Elements and Transclusion (Thursday, 12 October)
• Getting Ready for Workshop (and alpha-Requirements Doc) (Saturday, 7 October)

Mark Scherling

• access control and encryption (Monday, 23 October)
• proposed approach to XML encryption (Friday, 20 October)

Michiharu Kudoh

• RE: proposed approach to XML encryption (Monday, 23 October)

P Brandt

• Towards secure XML (sXML) (Tuesday, 24 October)

Steve Wiley

• Re: Problem: How to encrypt nodes without breaking parsers (Saturday, 28 October)
• Re: Suggestions for requirements ... (Saturday, 28 October)
• Suggestions for requirements ... (Sunday, 22 October)
• Re: Problem: How to encrypt nodes without breaking parsers (Monday, 2 October)

Takeshi Imamura

• Re: XmlEncryptor - An XML Encryption Demonstrator (Monday, 30 October)
• Re: comments on "Note on XML Encryption" (Friday, 27 October)
• RE: Review of "Note on XML Encryption" (Friday, 27 October)
• Re: comments on "Note on XML Encryption" (Friday, 27 October)
• Re: Review of "Note on XML Encryption" (Thursday, 26 October)
• <EncryptionInfo>'s rough design (Thursday, 5 October)
• Re: Problem: How to encrypt nodes without breaking parsers (Monday, 2 October)

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 October 2000 17:28:10 UTC