- From: Ernesto Damiani <edamiani@telnetwork.it>
- Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 02:06:00 +0200
- To: "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org>
- Cc: <xml-encryption@w3.org>
Looking at the agenda of the encryption workshop I feel confirmed in the opinion that there is quite a lot of interaction between XML access control and encryption requirements.. Unfortunately, it seems to be a bit late for us to start planning to attend the workshop ( just to listen :-) ).. Anyway, I'll be looking forward to reading the papers .. Rgds Ernesto ----- Original Message ----- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org> To: Ernesto Damiani <edamiani@telnetwork.it> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 5:54 PM Subject: Re: R: proposed approach to XML encryption > At 10:36 10/21/2000 +0200, Ernesto Damiani wrote: > >As a comment to recent postings, I just wanted to say that our approach > >currently allows for specifying fine-grained access control BOTH at the DTD > >AND at the single document level. > > Hi Ernesto, thank you for correcting me! As you probably noted from my > parenthetical comments, I felt I was on shaky ground in describing these > efforts. > > > There are several points in common with > >the XACL proposal, and we are meeting with Michiharu Kudo (IBM Tokyo > >research labs) on October 30th in order to put together a common draft, that > >will be posted to the list > > Cool! > > >(perhaps this topic could be discussed at the encryption workshop > >as well?) > > It's only in scope in as far as it provide requirements on Encryption > (whichs some of the present discussion does, and some of it doesn't! <smile>). > > > __ > Joseph Reagle Jr. > W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org > IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ >
Received on Monday, 23 October 2000 20:07:11 UTC