www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org from October to December 2005 by thread

Re: XLink 1.1: Animation Norman Walsh (Friday, 16 December)

Re: XLink 1.1: default xmlns attribute values Norman Walsh (Friday, 16 December)

Re: XLink 1.1: "URI reference" "checking" Norman Walsh (Friday, 16 December)

Re: XLink 1.1: XML Base confusion Norman Walsh (Friday, 16 December)

Good start - but simplify the system !!! IwanUswak@gmx.de (Saturday, 3 December)

Re: XLink 1.1 harmonization with RDF Norman Walsh (Tuesday, 8 November)

RE: Comments on WSDL 2.0 (Core, Adjuncts, Soap 1.1 Binding) from the i18n core wg Martin Duerst (Friday, 4 November)

[closed] Re: XLink 1.1: http://www.w3.org/2001/xml.xsd import Norman Walsh (Wednesday, 19 October)

I just want to use a link! What now? Jim Owens (Wednesday, 12 October)

Re: XLink 1.1: Integration with CSS Norman Walsh (Wednesday, 12 October)

Re: XLink 1.1: XLink 1.1 in XML 1.1 Norman Walsh (Wednesday, 12 October)

Re: XLink 1.1: Error handling Norman Walsh (Wednesday, 12 October)

Re: XLink 1.1: Security Considerations Norman Walsh (Wednesday, 12 October)

Re: CDF WG comments on XLink 1.1 LC Norman Walsh (Tuesday, 11 October)

Re: Comments from the I18N Core WG on XLink 1.1 Norman Walsh (Tuesday, 11 October)

[closed] Re: Base URI of a processing instruction Norman Walsh (Tuesday, 11 October)

Re: [xlink11] integration with existing markup Norman Walsh (Tuesday, 11 October)

Re: XLink 1.1: xlink:href requirements Norman Walsh (Tuesday, 11 October)

Re: XLink 1.1: "markup conformance testing" Norman Walsh (Tuesday, 11 October)

Re: XLink 1.1: Xlink vs "legacy" linking Norman Walsh (Tuesday, 11 October)

[closed] Re: XLink 1.1: 5.2 example incorrect Norman Walsh (Tuesday, 11 October)

Re: XLink 1.1: RFC 2119 conformance Norman Walsh (Tuesday, 11 October)

Re: XLink 1.1: XPointer reference Norman Walsh (Tuesday, 11 October)

Re: XLink 1.1: Charmod conformance Norman Walsh (Tuesday, 11 October)

Re: XLink 1.1: "XML document" undefined Norman Walsh (Tuesday, 11 October)

Re: XLink 1.1: Open issues? Norman Walsh (Tuesday, 11 October)

[spam] Re: your advertizing is not as good as it could be Norman Walsh (Tuesday, 11 October)

Last message date: Friday, 16 December 2005 20:56:14 UTC