Re: CDF WG comments on XLink 1.1 LC

On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 10:25:47AM -0400, Norman Walsh wrote:
> |> I think that is outside of the scope of the changes we are chartered
> |> to make.
> |
> | That may very well be; we didn't check the chartered scope of the
> | effort.
> 
> Based on your description below, it certainly is outside our chartered
> scope. I think we're going to have to decline to address your concerns
> on that basis. Are you satisfied with that resolution?

Yes, thanks Norm, we are.  We have no dependencies on XLink, so that's
not a problem for us.

Mark.
-- 
Mark Baker.  Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.          http://www.markbaker.ca
Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies   http://www.coactus.com

Received on Sunday, 23 October 2005 02:38:48 UTC