Re: XLink 1.1: Charmod conformance

/ Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> was heard to say:
| * Norman Walsh wrote:
|>/ Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> was heard to say:
|>|   http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-xlink11-20050707/ does not conform to
|>| <http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-charmod-20050215/>,
|>
|>In what way, and how can you tell?
|
| It does not require content to conform to Charmod as required in section
| 2 of charmod and C014 is violated due to adopting RFC 3987, for example.

How does RFC 3987 violate C014?

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.