[closed] Re: CDF WG comments on XLink 1.1 LC

/ Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org> was heard to say:
| On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 10:25:47AM -0400, Norman Walsh wrote:
|> |> I think that is outside of the scope of the changes we are chartered
|> |> to make.
|> |
|> | That may very well be; we didn't check the chartered scope of the
|> | effort.
|> 
|> Based on your description below, it certainly is outside our chartered
|> scope. I think we're going to have to decline to address your concerns
|> on that basis. Are you satisfied with that resolution?
|
| Yes, thanks Norm, we are.  We have no dependencies on XLink, so that's
| not a problem for us.

Thanks, Mark.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.