Re: CDF WG comments on XLink 1.1 LC

|> I think that is outside of the scope of the changes we are chartered
|> to make.
|
| That may very well be; we didn't check the chartered scope of the
| effort.

Based on your description below, it certainly is outside our chartered
scope. I think we're going to have to decline to address your concerns
on that basis. Are you satisfied with that resolution?

|>That said, I'm not really sure I understand what you're asking
|> for, could you elaborate a little?
|
| Just that when linking is done with "inclusion" semantics, i.e. where
| the included content is to be seen as logically a "peer" with the
| document that links to it (as with html:object, or html:img), the
| relationship often necessitates the passing of additional parameters.
| See the example above.
|
| As XLink supports these same inclusion semantics via show="embed", we
| thought that parameter support would also be nice to have, at least for
| our requirements... though the group didn't specifically discuss
| 'show="embed"'.
|
| Just my 2c based on what I understood of concensus in the WG...

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.