www-xml-infoset-comments@w3.org from January to March 2000 by author

Andrew Layman

• Consistent use of the term 'null' (Wednesday, 23 February)

C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

• review of Infoset 20 Dec 1999 (Friday, 28 January)
• comments from XML Schema WG on Infoset 1999-12-20 (Friday, 28 January)

cotton@ca.ibm.com

• Last Call feedback on XML Infoset (Monday, 28 February)

Dan Connolly

• which infoset is used for c14n? (Saturday, 4 March)
• XML Namespaces to include xml:base functionality (Tuesday, 11 January)

Daniel Barclay

• a few typos and text-replacement "editos" (Tuesday, 28 March)

David McKelvie

• Re: W3C Working Draft 20-December-1999 (Friday, 21 January)

Henry S. Thompson

• Terminology request (Monday, 21 February)

Internet User

• what kind of grammars are XML,DTD and XSL files (Tuesday, 1 February)

Jeroen van Rotterdam

• declared namespaces and createAttributeNS (Monday, 24 January)

John Cowan

• Version numbers for Infoset and Canonicalization drafts (Thursday, 20 January)

Jonathan Marsh

• Integration of xml:base and the infoset (Wednesday, 19 January)

JOrendorff@ixl.com

• DOM Level 1 Infoset compliance (Wednesday, 16 February)

Kay Michael

• Relationship or Canonical XML to the InfoSet (Monday, 24 January)

Martin J. Duerst

• Internationalization last call comments on Infoset (Monday, 24 January)
• Various comments on XML Infoset last call (Tuesday, 4 January)

Nils Klarlund

• More comments (Wednesday, 26 January)
• Call for unified tree model (Monday, 24 January)
• XML infoset: please don't (Tuesday, 18 January)

Susan Lesch

• minor typos in WD-xml-infoset-19991220 (Thursday, 13 January)

ulf wiman

• Inquirey (Monday, 31 January)

Last message date: Tuesday, 28 March 2000 12:29:25 UTC