- From: Martin J. Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2000 18:45:57 +0900
- To: www-xml-infoset-comments@w3.org
The spec is in good shape, my comments are mostly editorial: - In the TOC, expand section 2 by one level, so that it's easy to jump directly to any of the info items (this is what many people looking at the spec will want to do). - In the paragraph just before 2.1, you say 'Note that peripheral information items can, and do, have core properties.' When I read this, I was confused. An explanation follows very much later, in Conformance. Please give more information in 2., so as not to leave the reader confused. - Various expansions of [children] lists (e.g. [children - comments]: All these contain the text 'added to the ordered list of children'. Changing 'children' to '[children]' will make it clearer where things get actually added. - 2.2.2.8: 'distinct from that previously mentioned': Which 'that'? - 2.4.1. Why does [content] say 'a string representing', but 'target' doesn't? Also, the definitions are a bit involved, content both denoting all of the content of a PI and only what's left after the PI target. Probably the WG already searched thoroughly for a better name than 'content'. An improvement could be made, however, by changing the definition of target to something like 'the target of the PI', and if necessary refering to production 17 in the XML spec. This removes the word 'content' from the definition. - 2.6: 'logically-separate' -> 'logically separate' - 2.11, 2.12, 2.13, 2.14: 'an peripheral' and 'an general': 'an' -> 'a'. - Example: The example should not only give the core information items, but also the peripheral ones. The phrase 'will contain at least' should clearly be connected to terminology used elsewhere, e.g. core vs. peripheral. - References should be separated into normative and non-normative. - Unicode (3.0!) and/or ISO 10646 should be referenced, from 2.6.1.1. Regards, Martin. #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, World Wide Web Consortium #-#-# mailto:duerst@w3.org http://www.w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 4 January 2000 04:51:02 UTC