W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-infoset-comments@w3.org > January to March 2000

XML Namespaces to include xml:base functionality

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 12:56:26 -0600
Message-ID: <387B7CDA.93878C05@w3.org>
To: w3c-xml-linking-wg@w3.org
CC: w3c-xml-core-wg@w3.org, www-xml-infoset-comments@w3.org
[W3C Members, note well: this message is copied to
a public forum. So if just "reply all" your message will be publicly
Feel free to delete from the cc: line before you send your reply.

Other folks: some references are to member-confidential materials.

Linking WG folks,

In response to
"Issue (xmlbase:namespaces-compatibility): Should
                   Namespaces be extended to take xml:base attributes
	-- http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WD-xmlbase-19991220

The XML Core WG decided, on 5 Jan, that yes they should:
"Resolved:  that xml:base affects relative namespace names
in namespace declarations.


ACTION to Dan to send email to XLink WG cc-ing XML Core WG and Infoset 
comment mailing lists about this.

DECISION: we will also add xml:base to Infoset.

DECISION: we will add Namespaces 1.1 to our task list and 
add a discussion xml:base to it.

ACTION to Paul: add this to our task list (done).

NOTE:  This will also require a change to XSLT."


For background, including an example that will (hopefully) clarify
the issue to yourselves and, if you/we put it in the XBase/Namespaces
to our readers, please see the thread starting with:

if we do XBase, do it for xmlns too
From: Dan Connolly (connolly@w3.org)
Date: Tue, Jan 04 2000 

Note also the dissenting opinion:

Reasons for not incorporating xbase into the namespace spec (Tue, Jan 04

Dan Connolly
Received on Tuesday, 11 January 2000 13:58:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:08:00 UTC