- From: Steve Tuecke <tuecke@mcs.anl.gov>
- Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 16:53:53 -0600
- To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Tied up meetings the next two weeks. -Steve At 12:04 PM 11/6/2002, Jonathan Marsh wrote: >0. Dial in information (members only) [.1]: > >See the public WG page [.2] for pointers to current documents and other >information, and the private page [.3] for administrative matters. > >If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list >before the start of the telcon. > >[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2002Nov/0006.html >[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/ >[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin > >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >Agenda > >1. Assign scribe. Lucky minute taker for this week is: > Steve Tuecke (fallbacks Don Wright, Glen Daniels, Kevin Liu, Tom >Jordahl, Jacek Kopecky) > >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >2. Approval of minutes of Oct 31 telcon [.1]. Kevin Liu had sent >regrets, which I missed. > >[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Nov/0010.html > >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >3. Review of Action items. >? 2002-09-10: Gudge, jeffsch, roberto et al to write proposal > to replace message with complexType [due this >week] >FTF 2002-09-10: Gudge to provide summary of using W3C XML Schema > to wrap other type systems at an appropriate level > of abstraction. >FTF 2002-09-11: Jeffrey, DonM to define TCP binding. >FTF 2002-09-19: Joyce, Sandeep, Igor, Steve T, Sanjiva, Adi, > Roberto, Amy to form task force to prepare > presentation on adding pub/sub as first class to > WSDL 1.2. >? 2002-09-19: Sanjiva to write a Java binding. >FTF 2002-10-10: Gudge to prepare proposal for promoting operations > to the top level. >? 2002-10-17: Gudge and A. Lewis to make a proposal for > describing xs:import and (apparently) xs:schema > as "required" extensibility elements. >? 2002-10-24: Jacek to provide commentary/response to Arthur's > identification by URI proposal. >? 2002-10-31: Arthur will redo proposal to get rid of urn:, also > > look at XPointer framework. >DONE [.1] 2002-10-31: Jonathan will look at normalized unique >namespaces. >DONE [.2] 2002-10-31: Phillipe will follow up on what we must do about a > media type. > >[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Nov/0023.html >[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Nov/0020.html > >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >4. Administrivia > a. Any last minute FTF logistical questions? > >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >5. FTF agenda [.1]. > Besides the current discussion topics, we should have time to go >over some open issues. Here are a set of candidates I came up with from >the issues list at [.2]. Champions appreciated! > >Type system issues: > issue-allow-nonxml-typesystems > Allow non-XML type systems? > issue-clarify-type-and-element > Clarify use of type= and element= in part with XML Schema experts. > > >Naming issues: > issue-operation-name-uniqueness > Need to be able to distinguish between operations with the same > NCName in different portTypes > issue-fault-name-uniqueness > Should faults be named with QNames? > issue-toplevel-element-name-uniqueness > Should all top-level elements' names be unique across the > target namespace? > >Part 2 issues: > Are there any issues we can tackle prior to the property/feature >discussion? > >[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2002Nov/0005.html >[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html > >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >6. New Issues. Merged issues list [.1]. > None found. > >[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >7. Managing extensions [.1]. Is a registry called for? Philippe's >summary of a related issue in WS Arch [.2], about WS-Security defining >WSDL extensions [.3]. > >[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Nov/0011.html >[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Nov/0027.html >[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Nov/0006.html > >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >8. WSDL media type registration. Mark Baker's conclusion [.1]. Tag >finding [.2], WG process guideline [.3]. > >[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Nov/0009.html >[.2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/0129-mime >[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/06/registering-mediatype > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >9. Equivalence of Services [.1]. > >[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Oct/0151.html > >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >10. Importing Schema into WSDL > Two alternative proposals. Two elements [.1] or one [.2]. > >[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Oct/0067.html >[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Oct/0114.html > >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >11. Identification of a Service [.1] / Arthur's [.2] identification >proposal [.3]. Comparison with NUNs [.4]. > >[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2002Oct/0017.html >(members only) >[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Oct/0084.html >[.3] >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Oct/att-0084/01-URI- >References.html >[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Nov/0023.html > >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >12. A slice at a proposal for SOAP features/properties in WSDL [.1]. >Canon's change requests [.2]. Amy's comments [.3]. Tibco proposal >(revised) [.4]. Tibco SOAP email binding [.5]. > >[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Sep/0004.html >[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Sep/0080.html >[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Oct/0104.html >[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Oct/0149.html >[.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Oct/0126.html > >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >13. Rationale for dropping the <soap:body use=...> attribute [.1] > Proposal from Jacek on better describing the extensibility >mechanism to support other languages. [.2] > >[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Sep/0054.html >[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Oct/0040.html > >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >14. BindingType proposal from Kevin [.1]. > Awaiting further work on Part 2 AM. > >[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Aug/0009.html > >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >15. Issue 2: SOAPAction has been deprecated, as of SOAP 1.2 [.1]. > Jean-Jacques proposal at [.2]. > Jacek's addendum at [.3]. > Dependent upon Glen's feature/property proposal. > >[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x2 >[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Sep/0050.html >[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Sep/0056.html > >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >16. Issue 28: transport='uri' [.1] > Dependent upon Glen's feature/property proposal. > >[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x28 > >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >17. HTTP Binding Issues (6a, 41) > Jeffrey recommends no change [.1]. > Sanjiva is mulling this over [.2]. > Dependent upon Glen's feature/property proposal. > >[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0102.html >[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0067.html > >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >18. Issue 25: Interaction between W3C XML Schema and SOAP Data Model > Gudge's explains at [.1], Roberto's options at [.2]. > Waiting for more detail in ACM? > >[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0186.html >[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0071.html > >- Jonathan
Received on Wednesday, 6 November 2002 18:33:13 UTC