proposal for equivalence of top level items

• From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
• Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 22:05:15 +0600
• To: "WS-Desc WG \(Public\)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <00f601c280f7$4e651500$6900a8c0@lankabook2>

I have a pending action item to propose equivalence rules for
top level items. Here it is, finally:

schema stuff:
    out of scope

<message>
    messages m1 and m2 are equivalent iff their QNames are the same
    (i.e., equal - using rules which someone else has defined for
    QName equivalence .. if these don't exist then we can define them)

<portType>
    pt1 and pt2 equivalent iff their QNames are the same

<binding>
    iff QNames are equivalent

<service>
    iff QNames are equivalent

So basically its name equivalence for all ..

Bye,

Sanjiva.

Received on Thursday, 31 October 2002 11:07:30 UTC