- From: Allen Brookes <abrookes@roguewave.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 14:08:32 -0800
- To: "'www-ws-desc@w3.org'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Web Services Description Working Group 2002-10-31 meeting minutes Present: David Booth W3C Allen Brookes Rogue Wave Software Roberto Chinnici Sun Microsystems Glen Daniels Macromedia Youenn Fablet Canon Dietmar Gaertner Software AG Sandeep Kumar Cisco Systems Philippe Le Hégaret W3C Amelia Lewis TIBCO Steve Lind AT&T Jonathan Marsh Chair (Microsoft) Dale Moberg Cyclone Commerce Don Mullen Tibco Arthur Ryman IBM Waqar Sadiq Electronic Data Systems Jeffrey Schlimmer Microsoft Igor Sedukhin Computer Associates William Stumbo Xerox Jerry Thrasher Lexmark Steve Tuecke Global Grid Forum William Vambenepe Hewlett-Packard Sanjiva Weerawarana IBM Joyce Yang Oracle Prasad Yendluri webMethods, Inc. Regrets: Steve Graham Global Grid Forum Martin Gudgin Microsoft Tom Jordahl Macromedia Jacek Kopecky Systinet Jean-Jacques Moreau Canon Don Wright Lexmark Barbara Zengler DaimlerChrysler Research and Technology Agenda http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Oct/0150.html 1. Assign scribe. 2. Approval of minutes of Oct 24 telcon 3. Review of Action items. 4. FTF preparations. 5. Requirements doc published 6. New Issues 7. Importing Schema into WSDL 8. Identification of a Service 9. Modest proposal 10. A slice at a proposal for SOAP features/properties in WSDL 11. Rationale for dropping the <soap:body use=...> attribute 12. BindingType proposal from Kevin 13. Issue 2: SOAPAction has been deprecated, as of SOAP 1.2 14. Issue 28: transport='uri' 15. HTTP Binding Issues 16. Issue 25: Interaction between W3C XML Schema and SOAP Data Model ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Assign scribe Amy Lewis (TIBCO/Extensibility) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. Approval of minutes of 24 Oct telcon Approved ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. Review of action items Sanjiva proposal for equivalence of top-level components: done sanjiva action item: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Oct/0151.html Gudge, roll port typ inheritance into main branch: done Roberto to see how this might affect the feature proposal: drop JMarsh provide document ready for publication: done Sanjiva to act as issues editor: done DBooth to discuss scenarios for embed/import of shcemas in primer: done Philippe - new policy on IP disclosures [[ Q.What happens if a participant makes a patent license commitment that offers to license on Royalty-Free terms following the CPP, but attaches modifications to the licensing conditions? ]] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. F2F Preparations ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. Requirements doc published ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. New Issue: is "extends" attribute optional? Wait another week to discuss (7) Importing Schema into WSDL, perhaps wait to f2f ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 7. Importing schema into WSDL Wait another week to discuss Importing Schema into WSDL, perhaps wait to f2f ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 8. Identification of a service / Arthur's identification proposal Are we supposed to be defining a new media type or not? David Orchard's comments imply that we are not but Phillipe remembers that we are and will look for document that says this. Jonathan - we should look at Schemas normalized unique namespaces note to see if this solves our service identification issues. Action: Arthur will redo proposal to get rid of urn:, also look at XPointer framework. Action: Jonathan will look at normalized unique namespaces. Action: Phillipe will follow up on what we must do about a media type. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 9. Modest proposal Decision: editors will add statement to WSDL spec along the lines of 2a in DBooths proposal from (9). ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 .A slice at a proposal for SOAP features/properties in WSDL Tibco SOAP email binding document in (10) informational only, we don't need to act on it. Discussion on Amy's proposal, will continue on email. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 11 - 16 (see above) These items were not discussed.
Received on Friday, 1 November 2002 17:11:23 UTC