www-rdf-logic@w3.org from March 2001 by date

Saturday, 31 March 2001

Re: DAML+OIL (March 2001) released Seth Russell
Re: DAML+OIL (March 2001) released: a correction Jonas Liljegren
Re: Aside - Re: Question: DAML cardinality restrictions Eric PERRY TRANSFLUENCE
numerals aren't numbers; they're related to numbers Dan Connolly
Re: DAML+OIL (March 2001) released jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: DAML+OIL (March 2001) released: a correction pat hayes

Friday, 30 March 2001

RE: KIF Axioms of Restriction Mitch Kokar
Re: DAML+OIL (March 2001) released pat hayes
RE: DAML+OIL (March 2001) released Hart, Lewis
RE: Aside - Re: Question: DAML cardinality restrictions pat hayes
RDF_PI Danny Ayers
Description Logics (DL2001) CFP - Deadline april 16, 2001 Deborah Mcguinness
CFP: Workshop on Ontologies at KI 2001 Gerd Stumme
Re: Aside - Re: Question: DAML cardinality restrictions Jonas Liljegren
Re: Semantic Web Mining Gerd Stumme
RE: Aside - Re: Question: DAML cardinality restrictions Peter Crowther
Re: Question: DAML cardinality restrictions Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Aside - Re: Question: DAML cardinality restrictions Jan Grant
Question: DAML cardinality restrictions David Allsopp

Thursday, 29 March 2001

Re: [RDF] Re: Comments on N3 and its use for writing rules Jonas Liljegren
Re: DAML+OIL (March 2001) released Jonas Liljegren
RE: DAML+OIL (March 2001) released Peter Crowther
RE: DAML+OIL (March 2001) released Dan Brickley
Re: DAML+OIL (March 2001) released Jonas Liljegren
RE: DAML+OIL (March 2001) released Peter Crowther
Re: DAML+OIL (March 2001) released Dan Connolly
Re: DAML+OIL (March 2001) released Jonas Liljegren
Re: DAML+OIL (March 2001) released Jonathan Borden

Wednesday, 28 March 2001

RDFSuite website announcement Greg Karvounarakis
RE: DAML+OIL (March 2001) released Holmes III, William S
RE: DAML+OIL (March 2001) released Holmes III, William S
Re: DAML+OIL (March 2001) released Dan Connolly
Re: DAML+OIL (March 2001) released Jonas Liljegren
DAML+OIL (March 2001) released Mike Dean

Sunday, 25 March 2001

Re: need information. jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

Friday, 23 March 2001

Re: gedcom-relation example jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

Thursday, 22 March 2001

Re: gedcom-relation example jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: gedcom-relation example Tim Berners-Lee

Wednesday, 21 March 2001

RE: Datalog With Only Binary Relations Is Too Weak pat hayes

Tuesday, 20 March 2001

RE: Datalog With Only Binary Relations Is Too Weak pat hayes
RE: Datalog With Only Binary Relations Is Too Weak jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
XML Schema: Formal Description is now published (fwd) Dan Brickley
Re: Datalog With Only Binary Relations Is Too Weak Drew McDermott
RE: Datalog With Only Binary Relations Is Too Weak jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
RE: Datalog With Only Binary Relations Is Too Weak pat hayes

Monday, 19 March 2001

Re: Datalog With Only Binary Relations Is Too Weak jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: Datalog With Only Binary Relations Is Too Weak pat hayes
RE: Datalog With Only Binary Relations Is Too Weak jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: Datalog With Only Binary Relations Is Too Weak Drew McDermott
RE: Datalog With Only Binary Relations Is Too Weak pat hayes
RE: Datalog With Only Binary Relations Is Too Weak jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: Uniqueness of Skolemization? pat hayes

Sunday, 18 March 2001

RE: Datalog With Only Binary Relations Is Too Weak Graham Klyne
Uniqueness of Skolemization? Graham Klyne

Saturday, 17 March 2001

RE: Datalog With Only Binary Relations Is Too Weak jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

Friday, 16 March 2001

RE: Datalog With Only Binary Relations Is Too Weak pat hayes
Re: Comments on N3 and its use for writing rules Tim Berners-Lee
Re: Datalog With Only Binary Relations Is Too Weak Sandro Hawke
RE: Datalog With Only Binary Relations Is Too Weak Stefan Decker
RE: Datalog With Only Binary Relations Is Too Weak Cayzer, Steve
Re: Datalog With Only Binary Relations Is Too Weak jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Datalog With Only Binary Relations Is Too Weak Sandro Hawke

Wednesday, 14 March 2001

RE: KIF Axioms of Restriction Mitch Kokar
Functional-Logic RDF [was: function terms in Euler, n3, and jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

Tuesday, 13 March 2001

Comments on N3 and its use for writing rules Jonas Liljegren
CFP E- Business & the Intelligent Web **extended deadline** Alun Preece

Sunday, 11 March 2001

Re: rdf:value backwards Aaron Swartz

Friday, 9 March 2001

Re: function terms in Euler, n3, and RDF [was: gedcom-relati pat hayes
Re: KIF Axioms of Restriction pat hayes
Re: KIF Axioms of Restriction Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: function terms in Euler, n3, and RDF [was: gedcom-relati Sandro Hawke
KIF Axioms of Restriction Mitch Kokar
Re: function terms in Euler, n3, and RDF [was: gedcom-relati jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: Spec doesn't talk about two-valued relationships jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: function terms in Euler, n3, and RDF [was: gedcom-relation e pat hayes

Thursday, 8 March 2001

RE: "Is a Property a Class" and other DAML questions Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RE: "Is a Property a Class" and other DAML questions Hart, Lewis
RE: "Is a Property a Class" and other DAML questions Hart, Lewis

Wednesday, 7 March 2001

RE: "Is a Property a Class" and other DAML questions Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: expressing scope of negation of failure (wasRe: Open Worlds, Distribution, Delegation, Federation, Logic, NI ) Tim Berners-Lee
Re: "Is a Property a Class" and other DAML questions Aaron Swartz
RE: "Is a Property a Class" and other DAML questions Hart, Lewis
Re: expressing scope of negation of failure (wasRe: Open Worlds, Distribution, Delegation, Federation, Logic, NI ) Frank Manola
Re: function terms in Euler, n3, and RDF [was: gedcom-relati jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: function terms in Euler, n3, and RDF [was: gedcom-relation e Dan Connolly
Re: function terms in Euler, n3, and RDF [was: gedcom-relation e Sandro Hawke
Re: function terms in Euler, n3, and RDF [was: gedcom-relation e Sandro Hawke
Re: function terms in Euler, n3, and RDF [was: gedcom-relation e Graham Klyne
Re: function terms in Euler, n3, and RDF [was: gedcom-relation e jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: DAML+OIL and OIL Sean Bechhofer
Re: function terms in Euler, n3, and RDF [was: gedcom-relation e Dan Connolly
Last CFP: Agents 2001 Workshop on Ontologies in Agent Systems Stephen Cranefield
Re: DAML+OIL and OIL Tim Berners-Lee
expressing scope of negation of failure (wasRe: Open Worlds, Distribution, Delegation, Federation, Logic, NI ) Tim Berners-Lee
Re: DAML+OIL for queries Tim Berners-Lee
Re: function terms in Euler, n3, and RDF [was: gedcom-relation e Tim Berners-Lee

Tuesday, 6 March 2001

Re: function terms in Euler, n3, and RDF [was: gedcom-relation e jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: function terms in Euler, n3, and RDF [was: gedcom-relation e Sandro Hawke
Re: Where DAML+OIL deviates from the RDF-Schema spec. tim finin
Re: Where DAML+OIL deviates from the RDF-Schema spec. pat hayes
Re: Where DAML+OIL deviates from the RDF-Schema spec. tim finin

Monday, 5 March 2001

Re: Where DAML+OIL deviates from the RDF-Schema spec. Tim Berners-Lee
Re: Where DAML+OIL deviates from the RDF-Schema spec. pat hayes
Re: Where DAML+OIL deviates from the RDF-Schema spec. pat hayes
Re: Where DAML+OIL deviates from the RDF-Schema spec. pat hayes
Re: Where DAML+OIL deviates from the RDF-Schema spec. Reinhold Klapsing
Re: "Is a Property a Class" and other DAML questions Peter F. Patel-Schneider
"Is a Property a Class" and other DAML questions Balon, Corey
Re: Where DAML+OIL deviates from the RDF-Schema spec. Sigfrid Lundberg, Lub NetLab
Re: Where DAML+OIL deviates from the RDF-Schema spec. Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Where DAML+OIL deviates from the RDF-Schema spec. Sigfrid Lundberg, Lub NetLab
Re: Where DAML+OIL deviates from the RDF-Schema spec. Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: DAML+OIL and OIL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: function terms in Euler, n3, and RDF [was: gedcom-relation e jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
gedcom-relation example jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: Where DAML+OIL deviates from the RDF-Schema spec. Sigfrid Lundberg, Lub NetLab
Re: Where DAML+OIL deviates from the RDF-Schema spec. Tim Berners-Lee
function terms in Euler, n3, and RDF [was: gedcom-relation example] Dan Connolly

Sunday, 4 March 2001

gedcom-relation example jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

Saturday, 3 March 2001

Re: Open Worlds, Distribution, Delegation, Federation, Logic jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: Where DAML+OIL deviates from the RDF-Schema spec. Deborah Mcguinness
RE: Where DAML+OIL deviates from the RDF-Schema spec. Mitch Kokar
Re: Where DAML+OIL deviates from the RDF-Schema spec. Ian Horrocks

Friday, 2 March 2001

Re: Open Worlds, Distribution, Delegation, Federation, Logic, NI Sandro Hawke
Re: DAML+OIL for queries Jonas Liljegren
Re: Open Worlds, Distribution, Delegation, Federation, Logic, NI jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: DAML+OIL for queries Dave Reynolds

Thursday, 1 March 2001

Re: Where DAML+OIL deviates from the RDF-Schema spec. Jim Hendler
RE: Where DAML+OIL deviates from the RDF-Schema spec. pat hayes
Re: Where DAML+OIL deviates from the RDF-Schema spec. Seth Russell
RE: Where DAML+OIL deviates from the RDF-Schema spec. Peter Crowther
Re: Where DAML+OIL deviates from the RDF-Schema spec. Dan Brickley
Re: Where DAML+OIL deviates from the RDF-Schema spec. Tim Berners-Lee
CFP: International Semantic Web Workshop (Infrastructure and Applications for the Semantic Web) Je'ro^me Euzenat
Open Worlds, Distribution, Delegation, Federation, Logic, NILE, etc Sandro Hawke
DAML+OIL for queries Jonas Liljegren
Re: DAML+OIL and OIL Je'ro^me Euzenat

Last message date: Saturday, 31 March 2001 11:47:22 UTC