- From: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2001 13:42:15 +0000
- To: Jonas Liljegren <jonas@rit.se>
- CC: www-rdf-logic@w3.org, Wraf development <rdf@uxn.nu>
> Can DAML+OIL be used for declaring wanted resources? I believe so. In particular DAML+OIL are based on the notion of description logics and there has been work done in using description logics to specify queries in deductive database systems. A good overview paper that I found helpful in understanding the area was "Description Logics in Data Management", Alex Borgida, IEEE Trans Knowledge and Data Eng, 7, #5, Oct 95. Doubtless there is more recent work in the area. > Has anyone here a suggestions on how to write those descriptions? You > basicly have to insert a way to add ORs and NOTs. AND is the > default. I may be misunderstanding the question but while "AND" is sort-of the default for the RDF assertions, DAML+OIL is richer. Taking the approach of treating DAML+OIL as specifying descriptions then the unionOf, intersectionOf, complementOf properties give you AND, OR and NOT. You could generate a description of the things you are trying to retrieve using these properties and then have a reasoner/database retrieve those objects which are instances of your specified class. I confess to being new to description logics and DAML so if my assumptions that it all fits together this way are wrong then please correct me! Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------ Hewlett-Packard Laboratories | Phone: +44-117-3128165 Filton Road, Stoke Gifford | FAX: +44-117-3128925 Bristol BS34 8QZ, UK | dave_reynolds@hpl.hp.com
Received on Friday, 2 March 2001 08:42:36 UTC