- From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 16:26:59 -0600
- To: "Hart, Lewis" <lhart@grci.com>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- CC: <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
Hart, Lewis <lhart@grci.com> wrote: > Perhaps the implication is coming from this statement in the DAML+OIL spec: > > <rdfs:Class rdf:ID="Property"> > <sameClassAs > rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#Property"/> > </rdfs:Class> > > I am not an RDF(S) expert, but to me this says that a Property is a Class. > If this is not the case, what point am I missing? Actually, I think it just says that there is a class called Property. In other words, "Property" is a Class, but a property isn't. Which is confusing, but hardly wrong. -- [ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2001 17:26:33 UTC