Alex Rousskov
- Re: Does Informative = Non-Normative (Friday, 27 September)
- Re: Short Spec and Spec Guidelines (Tuesday, 24 September)
- Re: Conformance claims, Priorities (Friday, 20 September)
- Re: Extensions (Friday, 20 September)
- RE: testability definition (Monday, 9 September)
- RE: testability definition (Monday, 9 September)
- RE: testability definition (Monday, 9 September)
- Re: testability definition (Monday, 9 September)
- Re: testability definition (Sunday, 8 September)
- Re: testability definition (Sunday, 8 September)
- RE: testability definition (Saturday, 7 September)
- RE: testability definition (Friday, 6 September)
- RE: testability definition (Friday, 6 September)
- Re: testability definition (Friday, 6 September)
- Re: DoV and verifiability (Friday, 6 September)
- Re: DoV and verifiability (Friday, 6 September)
- Re: Should SpecGL be a spec? (Friday, 6 September)
- Re: Should SpecGL be a spec? (Thursday, 5 September)
- Should SpecGL be a spec? (Thursday, 5 September)
- Re: FYI : a new draft of "QA Framework - Specifications Guidelines" published (Thursday, 5 September)
Brian Kelly
Chris Croome
David Marston/Cambridge/IBM
David Wang
Dimitris Dimitriadis
Dominique Haza禱l-Massieux
Karl Dubost
Kirill Gavrylyuk
Lofton Henderson
- Re: QA f2f - logistics - "last call" (Monday, 30 September)
- Re: use of Priority vs Conformance Levels (Friday, 27 September)
- Conformance claims, Priorities (was: Re: FYI : a new draft of "QA Framework - Specifications Guidelines" published) (Friday, 20 September)
- Extensions -- correction (Friday, 20 September)
- Extensions (was: Re: FYI : a new draft of "QA Framework - Specifications Guidelines" published) (Friday, 20 September)
- RE: testability definition (Thursday, 19 September)
- Re: DoV and verifiability (Friday, 6 September)
- testability definition (was: Re: FYI : a new draft of "QA Framework - Specifications Guidelines" published) (Friday, 6 September)
- DoV and verifiability (was: Re: Should SpecGL be a spec?) (Friday, 6 September)
- Re: Should SpecGL be a spec? (Friday, 6 September)
- Re: Should SpecGL be a spec? (Friday, 6 September)
- Re: Should SpecGL be a spec? (Thursday, 5 September)
- Re: Should SpecGL be a spec? (Thursday, 5 September)
- normative keywords (was Re: FYI : a new draft of "QA Framework - Specifications Guidelines" published) (Tuesday, 3 September)
lsr@nist.gov
Lynne Rosenthal
Mark Skall
Micah Dubinko
Olivier Thereaux
pele
skall@nist.gov
Thierry Michel
Yves Lafon
Last message date: Monday, 30 September 2002 09:45:58 UTC